|
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Welcome to argument. I'm not writing a book here. I'm just hitting you with the twitter-feed of my contentions. There's depth to them that I'd be glad to explore if you'd engage them. But you don't. You just brush them aside.
How can I brush off points that I don't even disagree with? In your version of the NAP, you are RIGHT. But that isn't NAP.
And I'm not confused by the word illegit or invalid. They're nonsense.
Dude. How can you even say this when your claim about the term is not the NAP claim? Illegitimacy has nothing to do with moralizing against others, but clarifying when violence is allowed to those who espouse the NAP.
|