10-12-2009 09:36 PM
#1
| |
| |
| |
|
10-12-2009 09:52 PM
#2
| |
hit | |
|
10-12-2009 10:21 PM
#3
| |
Snap Call. | |
|
10-12-2009 10:53 PM
#4
| |
oh for sure! Buts shes gotta keep the grindhouse costume on. | |
| |
|
10-12-2009 11:35 PM
#5
| |
A few thoughts... | |
|
10-12-2009 11:48 PM
#6
| |
I haven't voted yet, but I'm leaning towards no b/c she looks diseased, used/abused, etc.... | |
|
10-13-2009 12:54 AM
#7
| |
ya.. I mean Id prob not do it if it was just a semi decent looking amputee.. but shes dressed up like the grindhouse character, so its an easy yes. | |
| |
|
10-13-2009 01:07 AM
#8
| |
LOL you guys and your standards. | |
|
10-13-2009 01:28 AM
#9
| |
mehhhhhh, its close. | |
|
10-13-2009 03:45 AM
#10
| |
Id do it. | |
| |
|
10-13-2009 05:13 AM
#11
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Snap call with possibility of regretting it later when she "turns over hers". |
|
10-13-2009 05:23 AM
#12
| |
So she is missing a leg. Who fucking cares. HIT. | |
|
10-13-2009 07:22 AM
#13
| |
Fist pump yes | |
| |
|
10-13-2009 05:47 PM
#14
| |
Too intrigued to say no | |
| |
|
10-13-2009 06:28 PM
#15
| |
yup yup | |
| |
|
10-13-2009 06:50 PM
#16
| |
| |
| |
|
10-13-2009 07:52 PM
#17
| |
Why is there no response from gmml in this thread? | |
|
10-13-2009 08:00 PM
#18
| |
| |
|
10-13-2009 08:31 PM
#19
| |
| |
| |
|
10-14-2009 06:27 AM
#20
| |
This is my third time in the thread and I only realised this time she has a leg missing. I'm the best at this game. | |
|
10-14-2009 10:35 AM
#21
| |
GIVE ME MY LEG | |
|
10-14-2009 10:43 AM
#22
| |
| |
|
10-14-2009 10:52 AM
#23
| |
| |
| |
|
10-14-2009 11:04 AM
#24
| |
| |
|
10-14-2009 11:26 AM
#25
| |
Something about a missing arm/leg/etc makes soemthing in my head/balls scream, "DO NOT WANT!!!" | |
|
10-14-2009 11:52 AM
#26
| |
If its good enough for Sir Paul McCartney, its good enough for me. | |
| |
|
10-14-2009 12:27 PM
#27
| |
I usually use the legs as a quote unquote crutch when my arms get tired, just toss em over my shoulder and lean...I don't think I have the stamina to fck an amputee | |
|
10-14-2009 10:10 PM
#28
| |
| |
| |
|
10-14-2009 10:52 PM
#29
| |
That's not why. | |
|