Whether it was intentional or not, it appears you get 100 posts on one page of a thread now rather than 50, which I think is better.
Good work (again) Xianti!
|
12-18-2005 07:53 AM
#1
| |
|
Guest
|
|
|
12-18-2005 02:05 PM
#2
| |
Blooming brill, eh, chap? | |
|
12-24-2005 05:52 AM
#3
| |
I think 50 is better, because if you want to read a post at the botttom it takes some time before the avatars are all loaded (that means the page jumps up and down a lot) | |
| |
|
12-24-2005 01:22 PM
#4
| |
Should we compromise and make it 70 per page? | |
|
12-24-2005 02:01 PM
#5
| |
|
Guest
|
|
|
12-24-2005 02:14 PM
#6
| |
| |
|
12-24-2005 02:16 PM
#7
| |
|
Guest
|
|
|
01-03-2006 04:22 AM
#8
| |
Dwarfman cracks the whip | |