$100nl May 1-6 Results/Stats

Thoughts?

how many tables is this again??

Maybe 3 bet more in blinds vs steals.

Won at SD 54% so your running good?? but for 3bb/100. btw im not 100% sure of the stat since 50%+is good

This isn't aimed at you Da GOAT, but I've never figured out why in the fuck people are convinced that Won $ at SD has to do with running good.

My god you rack up the hands. That's as many hands as I'm trying to get in for the month. ...then again I only 9-table.

Originally Posted by d0zer

My god you rack up the hands. That's as many hands as I'm trying to get in for the month. ...then again I only 9-table.

If he's 24tabling @ 60hands an hour thats only 12.5hours.

Originally Posted by Muzzard

Originally Posted by d0zer

My god you rack up the hands. That's as many hands as I'm trying to get in for the month. ...then again I only 9-table.

If he's 24tabling @ 60hands an hour thats only 12.5hours.

Yeah I know...I'm just a hobbyist who's impressed with myself for getting in 20k hands per month + working 50 hrs a week + wife + jiu-jitsu, so it blows me away when I see guys rack up like 60k hands a month...

I'm jealous cause my BR would grow so much faster...

i think you can play more hands in position 4 for sure, maybe 3 also considering you expect by now to have an edge over your opponents.

My feeling is that there is little difference between UTG and UTG+! and the same can be said for MP1 and MP2 so id definitly play more hands in MP1.

7% UTG also suggests you are mucking 77/66. , id love to play 77 perhaps also 66, even if we only limped (allowing us to limp AA occasionally etc etc) Is it standard to muck these? have you results on that? or is it part of the 24 tabling that you have to give these up.

My results suggest that raising 77 UTG is def +ev 66 is meh ev depending on how i play it and <66 is def -ev

Originally Posted by Miffed22001

i think you can play more hands in position 4 for sure, maybe 3 also considering you expect by now to have an edge over your opponents.

My feeling is that there is little difference between UTG and UTG+! and the same can be said for MP1 and MP2 so id definitly play more hands in MP1.

7% UTG also suggests you are mucking 77/66. , id love to play 77 perhaps also 66, even if we only limped (allowing us to limp AA occasionally etc etc) Is it standard to muck these? have you results on that? or is it part of the 24 tabling that you have to give these up.

My results suggest that raising 77 UTG is def +ev 66 is meh ev depending on how i play it and <66 is def -ev

Opening up anymore than I already am in early position isn't happening.

I don't open muck 66+ from any position.

Open limping is retarded.

None of this sample was 24-tabling.

Originally Posted by spoonitnow

Originally Posted by Miffed22001

i think you can play more hands in position 4 for sure, maybe 3 also considering you expect by now to have an edge over your opponents.

My feeling is that there is little difference between UTG and UTG+! and the same can be said for MP1 and MP2 so id definitly play more hands in MP1.

7% UTG also suggests you are mucking 77/66. , id love to play 77 perhaps also 66, even if we only limped (allowing us to limp AA occasionally etc etc) Is it standard to muck these? have you results on that? or is it part of the 24 tabling that you have to give these up.

My results suggest that raising 77 UTG is def +ev 66 is meh ev depending on how i play it and <66 is def -ev

Opening up anymore than I already am in early position isn't happening.

I don't open muck 66+ from any position.

Open limping is retarded. agreed. I wasnt necessarily suggesting this

None of this sample was 24-tabling.

so UTG
66+ AJs+ AQo+ ?[/b]

UTG I don't play AJs all the time. That's close, plus a predetermined % of suited connectors and whatnot.

Originally Posted by spoonitnow

UTG I don't play AJs all the time. That's close, plus a predetermined % of suited connectors and whatnot.

are your results promising with these sc's?

It worked ok in 6max for me, but i cant see it being great versus super weak tight nits in the full ring games we play?

Originally Posted by Miffed22001

Originally Posted by spoonitnow

UTG I don't play AJs all the time. That's close, plus a predetermined % of suited connectors and whatnot.

are your results promising with these sc's?

It worked ok in 6max for me, but i cant see it being great versus super weak tight nits in the full ring games we play?

There's much more to it than if the suited connectors and other non-premium things I play in early position by themselves are profitable, but when done properly it actually works out great against these guys if you play the situation well.

Move up already?

Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan

Move up already?

Oh God not this from you too =P

The plan for this month was to play 100nl for the first week then switch back to 200nl. I'm a huge huge bankroll nit, but whatever.

I've actually made more money at poker than you so far this month.

Less WoW, more poker g00t.

Originally Posted by Da GOAT

Won at SD 54% so your running good?? but for 3bb/100. btw im not 100% sure of the stat since 50%+is good

He's running ok. Won@SD is probably high because he reads hands well in that game.

nah its fair point, im so guilty of not studying PT much.

54% w$sd isn't that high for fullring