$200NL - I is All In

#1 New table, BB is a bad 14/11 Tag
$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
3 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
Hero ($225.00)
SB ($31.80)
BB ($310.25)

Pre-flop: ($3, 3 players) Hero is BTN
Hero raises to $7, SB calls $6, BB calls $5

Flop: ($21, 3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $15, SB goes all-in $24.8, BB raises to $52, Hero goes all-in $203, BB calls $166

Turn: ($481.8, 3 players)

River: ($481.8, 3 players)

[Results Hidden]


#2 16/9

$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
9 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($198.00)
UTG+1 ($53.25)
MP1 ($221.15)
MP2 ($200.00)
MP3 ($33.00)
CO ($205.15)
Hero ($200.00)
SB ($102.55)
BB ($198.45)

Pre-flop: ($3, 9 players) Hero is BTN
5 folds, CO raises to $8, Hero raises to $32, 2 folds, CO calls $24

Flop: ($67, 2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $52, CO goes all-in $173.15, Hero goes all-in $116

Turn: ($408.15, 2 players)

River: ($408.15, 2 players)

[Results Hidden]


#3 Unknown opponent
$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
10 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($55.85)
UTG+1 ($239.15)
UTG+2 ($200.00)
MP1 ($77.00)
MP2 ($103.00)
MP3 ($401.65)
Hero ($197.00)
BTN ($38.00)
SB ($199.95)
BB ($104.65)

Pre-flop: ($3, 10 players) Hero is CO
6 folds, Hero raises to $7, 2 folds, BB calls $5

Flop: ($15, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $10, BB calls $10

Turn: ($35, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $27, BB raises to $54, Hero raises to $171, BB goes all-in $33.65

River: ($293.65, 2 players)

[Results Hidden]


#4 Unknown
$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
7 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($150.18)
UTG+1 ($103.75)
MP ($44.00)
CO ($35.20)
BTN ($211.72)
Hero ($196.00)
BB ($40.00)

Pre-flop: ($3, 7 players) Hero is SB
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $8, 3 folds, Hero raises to $31, 1 fold, UTG+1 goes all-in $95.75, Hero calls $72.75

Flop: ($209.5, 2 players)

Turn: ($209.5, 2 players)

River: ($209.5, 2 players)

[Results Hidden]

i like all. how many hands did you actually win?

Originally Posted by pokerfan

i like all. how many hands did you actually win?

What he said.





i contribute nothing!

#3 I can get away from with a read, but against an unknown it's gotta go in.

Hey, good hands.

First and second are definitely more marginal than the third fourth but OK. I also think you need to raise less in position. Over pot is too much.

Originally Posted by Deanglow

First and second are definitely more marginal than the third fourth but OK. I also think you need to raise less in position. Over pot is too much.

I thought the opposite. I have a hard time putting the villain on set in hand 1. If he's got an overpair or worse (very likely) it's an easy call.

#2 I think is an easy shove as well. Ignore the slim chance that he's got a made straight flush. 7-9 outs to the nuts. If he has less than a flush, throw in 3-4 outs for the nut straight. That's already enough for me, and there's a slight possibility our ace might be live.

3 is scary for me. A slow-played eight fits the "story" of the hand. In that case, it's probably time to go broke. Thing is, what else does villain go nuts with here? A nine? I think this one is more marginal.

4. Pray for AK or Jacks? I don't like this one. Edit: I take it back after some thought. Do I think shorty has Kings or aces here? Not that often, no.

Originally Posted by Deanglow

First and second are definitely more marginal than the third fourth but OK. I also think you need to raise less in position. Over pot is too much.

Yup, the problem with hand 1 is that we have already a shorty who pushed and villain who raised. In this situation I think we'll see villain very often with set/2pairs. In the heat of the action I might push also, but it's indeed marginal.

For hand 2, Villain cannot have overpairs to this board so his range is much more tight that the other day hand:
KK,TT,99,QJo,QxQs,QJss
We have 9-7 outs to the nut flush. Plus 3 Jacks (if villain does not have a flush already).
Considering douts, let's suppose we have 9 outs in total that's about 33% of needed equity.
With the above range I don't think we have that.

Originally Posted by jimmy44

Originally Posted by Deanglow

First and second are definitely more marginal than the third fourth but OK. I also think you need to raise less in position. Over pot is too much.

Yup, the problem with hand 1 is that we have already a shorty who pushed and villain who raised. In this situation I think we'll see villain very often with set/2pairs. In the heat of the action I might push also, but it's indeed marginal.

For hand 2, Villain cannot have overpairs to this board so his range is much more tight that the other day hand:
KK,TT,99,QJo,QxQs,QJss
We have 9-7 outs to the nut flush. Plus 3 Jacks (if villain does not have a flush already).
Considering douts, let's suppose we have 9 outs in total that's about 33% of needed equity.
With the above range I don't think we have that.

I'd work on both calculating size of pot and working on odds.