Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
its not that hard to get
You don't type/speak English well enough for me to understand the ideas you're trying to communicate or something. It's like I'm reading what you type but I don't know what you're trying to get at, no offense. I'll give you an example.

this is because a 4betting range should be more unbalanced than a range that exclusively flats.
A 4-betting range should certainly be less unbalanced than if you always fold/called against 3-bets by definition as it would include hands both for value and for bluffs, but I don't think the word unbalanced is what you meant, so I get stuck here for 5-10 minutes trying to figure out what you mean.

In any event, it's not sufficient evidence to suggest that a strictly 4-betting range would be weaker overall than a strictly flat-calling range since the bluff part of the 4-betting range purposely has a weaker hand strength.