89 isn't likely, since as I said, he's a tight passive. I was more worried about JJ and 77 at this point, given that read. No reason to be in your opinion?
|
04-14-2005 05:07 PM
#5
| |
|
89 isn't likely, since as I said, he's a tight passive. I was more worried about JJ and 77 at this point, given that read. No reason to be in your opinion? |
|
| |
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote