Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFull Ring NL Hold'em

Confidence killed

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Default Confidence killed

    I've had a bad run lately, and I don't know whether it is because I suck or what. I'll just post some hands and comment on them if you want. Thanks.

    Hand #1: http://www.pokerhand.org/?628058
    - was I overaggressive here?

    Hand #2: http://www.pokerhand.org/?627962
    - can I really call with my hand amist all this action?

    Hand #3: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626628
    - for all you that said you can't fold a set on a non-connected, non flush board... I beg to differ.. i easily coulda layed this down, I thought for sure he had KK after he reraised me on the turn, but stupidly pushed all in.

    Hand #4: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626480
    - I have problems with this.. people bet large, or push AI on the river and i have something pretty good but not the nutz, do I lay down or call on river?
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    259
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    I don't play at limits this high so please take my comments with a grain of salt.

    1. Shit happens. Lay it down only if you have a really good read on opponent.

    2. Right fold. I won't be result oriented. Very rarely do you run into 3 other donks in the same hand. Given the action someone could easily have JJ or a set. The guy with pair+draw (14 outs) is actually ahead of you. I might not even bother to call the 1st flop bet.

    3. I don't know. I guess this is the mental part of the game.

    4. I might fold. An overpair probably won't lead into strength on the river.
    BBQSquirrel's poker blog

    100NL adventures -- both FR and 6max

    http://bbqsquirrel.blogspot.com
  3. #3
    Ravageur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,283
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    dude you played these hands fine, don't beat yourself up over 4 tough spots.

    You don't beat much in hand 1, but top two is tough to lay down on a non-flush-straight board.
    Family Cruise IMO
  4. #4

    Default Re: Confidence killed

    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer2k
    I've had a bad run lately, and I don't know whether it is because I suck or what. I'll just post some hands and comment on them if you want. Thanks.

    Hand #1: http://www.pokerhand.org/?628058
    - was I overaggressive here?

    Hand #2: http://www.pokerhand.org/?627962
    - can I really call with my hand amist all this action?

    Hand #3: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626628
    - for all you that said you can't fold a set on a non-connected, non flush board... I beg to differ.. i easily coulda layed this down, I thought for sure he had KK after he reraised me on the turn, but stupidly pushed all in.

    Hand #4: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626480
    - I have problems with this.. people bet large, or push AI on the river and i have something pretty good but not the nutz, do I lay down or call on river?
    Hmmm... sucks to be you

    Hand #1, With top 2 pair in a raised pot OOP I don't have a better line. You can't get a cheap showdown and you can't really lay down to the flop nearly min-raise. You beat AK, AJ, KK, draw, and a bluff... turn check raise line looks good to me because you maximize the value against the hands you beat.

    Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.

    Hand #4, fine. 4 to 1 odds
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred
    Would you bone your cousins? Salsa would.
    Quote Originally Posted by salsa4ever
    well courtie, since we're both clear, would you accept an invitation for some unprotected sex?
  5. #5

    Default Re: Confidence killed

    Quote Originally Posted by salsa4ever
    Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.
    Not playing 44 oop here when p/f raiser wants to play a big hand is silly. This is exactly the situation you want. Playing for set value is exactly the point.

    If you're routinely folding baby pairs in EP, you have a huge leak. The only debate is whether you should limp 'em or raise 'em, and to some people it's not a debate.
  6. #6

    Default Re: Confidence killed

    Quote Originally Posted by salsa4ever
    Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •