Ok heres the deal, I had been playin super loose super aggressive as usual seeing about 24% of flops 6 handed. This is what happened the first hand I was in with this player. The reason im showing everyone this hand is to show why I made the decision to call this same player on the second hand....

PokerStars Game #7541515894: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2006/12/21 - 14:00:24 (ET)
Table 'Alnilam IV' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Van Dutchman ($33.60 in chips)
Seat 3: RefuseResist ($25.95 in chips)
Seat 4: HERO ($52 in chips)
Seat 5: John Hero ($51.80 in chips)
Seat 6: Bastone1111 ($23.75 in chips)
John Hero: posts small blind $0.25
Bastone1111: posts big blind $0.50
Van Dutchman: posts small & big blinds $0.75
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [As Ah]
Van Dutchman: checks
RefuseResist: calls $0.50
HERO: raises $2.50 to $3
John Hero: folds
Bastone1111: folds
Van Dutchman: calls $2.50
RefuseResist: calls $2.50
*** FLOP *** [3h Qd 9c]
Van Dutchman: checks
RefuseResist: checks
HERO: bets $6
Van Dutchman: folds
RefuseResist: raises $16.95 to $22.95 and is all-in
ffdaleon joins the table at seat #2
HERO: calls $16.95
*** TURN *** [3h Qd 9c] [9s]
*** RIVER *** [3h Qd 9c 9s] [Kd]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
RefuseResist: shows [9d Jc] (three of a kind, Nines)
HERO: mucks hand
RefuseResist collected $53.90 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $55.90 | Rake $2
Board [3h Qd 9c 9s Kd]
Seat 1: Van Dutchman folded on the Flop
Seat 3: RefuseResist showed [9d Jc] and won ($53.90) with three of a kind, Nines
Seat 4: HERO (button) mucked [As Ah]
Seat 5: John Hero (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Bastone1111 (big blind) folded


Now I know some of you are goin to say why did I play this hand let alone raise it, please try to forget about the ho cards I have but focus more on if I should have folded OR not, and why I should of folded OR why I should have made the call I did. My thinking here is he probably doesnt have AA KK QQ JJ, nor AKc since he didnt raise pre flop, which im not worried about anyway, just tryin to put him on a hand. Though he might have AT 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 or TT. So I beat 7 hands yet lose to 3. However even 2 of the 3 that I lose to is doubtful that he has (22,33) since I myself have 2 of them outs. And also I took into account that less 10 hands ago this same player made a tricky aggressive move re-raising me with the 9j midpair weak kicker and sucked out on me as you all have seen in hand number one.

PokerStars Game #7541687261: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2006/12/21 - 14:14:48 (ET)
Table 'Alnilam IV' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Van Dutchman ($36.05 in chips)
Seat 2: ffdaleon ($19.90 in chips)
Seat 3: RefuseResist ($53.55 in chips)
Seat 4: HERO ($50.45 in chips)
Seat 5: John Hero ($57.85 in chips)
Seat 6: maymun77 ($32.70 in chips)
Van Dutchman: posts small blind $0.25
ffdaleon: posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [4h 3d]
RefuseResist: calls $0.50
HERO: raises $2.50 to $3
John Hero: calls $3
maymun77: folds
Van Dutchman: folds
ffdaleon: folds
RefuseResist: calls $2.50
*** FLOP *** [Th 4c 3c]
RefuseResist: checks
HERO: bets $9
John Hero: folds
RefuseResist: raises $41.55 to $50.55 and is all-in
HERO: calls $38.45 and is all-in
*** TURN *** [Th 4c 3c] [Jh]
*** RIVER *** [Th 4c 3c Jh] [7d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
RefuseResist: shows [3s 3h] (three of a kind, Threes)
HERO: mucks hand
RefuseResist collected $101.65 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $104.65 | Rake $3
Board [Th 4c 3c Jh 7d]
Seat 1: Van Dutchman (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: ffdaleon (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: RefuseResist showed [3s 3h] and won ($101.65) with three of a kind, Threes
Seat 4: HERO mucked [4h 3d]
Seat 5: John Hero folded on the Flop
Seat 6: maymun77 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
All thoughs opinions and suggestions are appreciated