Okay, it's play money, so purist might want to go to the next thread now, but it's my only contribution to the hand history so far. :

Check n Raise Poker Game #1590376: Hold 'em No Limit (2/5)
Sun Mar 20 11:16:22 EST 2005

Table 'Menotti' Seat #2 is the button

Seat 2: Hero (435)
Seat 3: SB (369.50)
Seat 4: BB (645)
Seat 9: CO (426)

SB: posts small blind 2
BB: posts big blind 5

*** HOLE-CARDS ***
Dealt to Hero [2 2]

CO: calls 5
Hero: raises 20 to 20
SB: calls 18
BB: calls 15
CO: calls 15

*** FLOP *** [8 T 8]

SB: bets 5
BB: calls 5
CO: calls 5
Hero: calls 5

*** TURN *** [8 T 8] [2]

SB: checks
BB: checks
CO: checks
Hero: bets 15
SB: calls 15
BB: calls 15
CO: calls 15

*** RIVER *** [8 T 8] [2] [Q]

SB: checks
BB: checks
CO: bets 30
Hero: raises 190 to 190
SB: folds
BB: folds
CO: calls 160

*** SHOW DOWN ***
Hero: shows [2 2 ] (a full house, twos full of eights)
CO: mucks [9 J ] (a straight, eight to queen)

Hero wins (540) with a full house, twos full of eights


---
Commentary:
* Yes, I may have made too much of a bet with the 2s trying to win the spot with a super-low pair, but it was only 4 players.
* Yes, perhaps only in play money would I have gotten calls all round to my bet on the turn.
* Should I have bet from the button at the turn, seeing that no one was representing the strength of trip eights, to help block a cheap card for flush draws?

So good move, bad move?
Case example why play money doesn't teach us anything?

what do you think?

-dunk