|
I did not have the Qh
The pot on the turn was 184. So i didn't pot it. I didn't want to give villain the free card so I bet 125. I was prepared to fold if villain check raised me all in at that point.
But what makes me curious is why would he call on the turn and push the river? If he had a made flush, surely he would not want a 4th heart to fall and either beat him or scare me off. I could see him doing this with an Axh or a missed draw. Is a set-->full house a realistic possibility?
As it turned out, I thought there was too many ways for me to be beat and folded. True to form, villian got real obnoxious in the chat along the lines of "HAHA FUKN WEAK A-HIGH..." Do you believe him?
On the turn, should I be thinking "I'm ahead, don't give him a free card", or "I'm behind... I'm check-folding", or "I don't know, and I'm only prepared to play a small pot. If villain sees my weakness and has the balls to attack and put me to the test on the river, then he outplays me and he gets it. If villain has no balls and makes a weak-looking bluff, I'll call him down".
Alternative way to put the question: in this situation
is pot control more important
OR
is not giving away the free card and not appearing weak (trying for the free showdown) more important
What should be my process when trying to decide whether to check, bet (and not commit, like this example), or bet and commit/push? Please don't say reads. I know they're useful.
What is your line if the board was KQ4 of hearts instead?
I have this turn play problem a lot. And i'm sure it's one of my biggest leaks ('cos these mistakes are *so* expensive!)
|