|
Well, for one I didn't intend to go broke when I flopped the flush draw. I just felt he was weak, and decided to make a move on the turn. What I actually had was basically irrelevant. I was playing his hand, both our images, and my fold equity vs his range, and I liked my chances. It's just nice to have outs when you try and make a play, just in case you are called. Also, the same argument applies equally to him as well. Why go broke in a limped pot with just TPGK to a tight player who just CR'ed you? He felt I was making a move based on his image, and took a stand. Sure folding to his flop raise or turn bet would be the safest play, but what good are reads if you're not willing to go with them?
Was it his strong flop raise, or his strong turn bet that made you feel he was weak? Or was it the fact that your read on him was that you were playing a tight, solid game?
What you have here certainly IS relevant, as it's infinitely making this play with outs then with two cards with no equity against his range. That said, When has playing a 250bb pot post-flop in a 3 way limped pot preflop with nothing but a 4-flush been good poker?
And his play of taking his hands too far (TPGK) works against your argument here, as you have to have a GREAT deal of fold equity for your entire play to be +EV, and I really don't feel like doing those calculations. But the fact that he will play a big pot with that kind of hand certainly doesn't look good for your play here...
As far as reads go, I'm going to have to have one hell of a read to turn a 3bb pot into a 250bb pot when I probably have somewhere between 25% and 35% equity on the flop, much less on the turn, and zero on the river. Like a mob is going to kill him if he goes broke this hand, and he will only put all of it in with the stone cold nuts...
Lukie, this was the first time I had seen M3lancholy play, and I knew he was most likely a thinking player, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt here and folded. If I knew how laggy he really played, I would never fold AK here.
well his 3-bet is very weak and giving you great odds, so that definately favors a call.
But
This doesn't necessarily apply to this hand, but you have to be able to seperate lagg play with maniac play. If m3l 3-bets into a very tight, UTG raiser, out of position with a hand that isn't > AK, then it's the ladder. Don't mistake splashing around in a lot of pots with a huge show of strength like that. Whether or not you think that's the case, well that's a decision you have to make based on imperfect information and not much time. IN GENERAL though, I play tight enough where I feel that, against most players, if I'm holding AK and I'm 3-betted, it's like, what am I looking to hit? They can see the board just as well as I can, and AK is certainly a hand that's going to be in my range. Can we say horrid reverse implied odds situation? Note that I'm not saying AK should be an automuck to a 3-bet, but these are just some common observations I have.
|