| 
		 
	 | 
		
			
			
			
			
				  Hiding aces
			
			
					
						
						
					
					
			
				
					
						My general read on UTG was slightly maniac, read on MP was a bit fishy.  Not terribly trustable as far as reads go, I'm new at this. 
 
(BLINDS $0.01/$0.02) NO LIMIT TEXAS HOLD'EM 
9 handed table - all pre-flop folds removed for clarity - there were no additional limpers 
 
 
Seat  3: Hero -CO ($6.35 in chips) 
Seat  7: UTG  ($1.88 in chips) 
Seat  9: MP  ($2.35 in chips) 
 
Dealt to Hero :Ah: :Ac: 
UTG: Call ($0.02) 
MP : Call ($0.02) 
Hero  : Raise ($0.08) 
UTG: Call ($0.06) 
MP : Call ($0.06) 
 
*** FLOP *** : :Ad: :Qs:   
UTG: Bet ($0.02) 
MP : Call ($0.02) 
Hero  : Raise ($0.04) 
UTG: Call ($0.02) 
MP : Call ($0.02) 
 
*** TURN *** : :Ad: :Qs:     
UTG: Bet ($0.08) 
MP : Call ($0.08) 
Hero  : Call ($0.08) 
 
*** RIVER *** : :Ad: :Qs:       
UTG: Bet ($0.08) 
MP : Fold  
Hero  : Raise ($1.80) 
UTG: Call All-in ($1.60) 
 
 
*** SUMMARY *** 
Pot: $3.81 | Rake: $0.20 
 
Results in grey: 
Hero bet $2, collected $3.93, net +$1.93 (showed hand) [ Ah  Ac ]  (three of a kind, aces) 
UTG lost $1.88 (showed hand) [ Qh  5d ]  (a pair of queens) 
 
 
So for this hand, hiding behind UTG's bet ended well, as it seems they thought my huge river raise was a bluff and MP got sucked out for more cash then if I would have raised the flop or river in any serious way, I think.  Question is, do y'all think this was a good play or a poor play that just happened to work out once?
					 
				 
				
			 
			 
		  
	 |