Looking over this hand in poker stove made me re-evaluate how much credit to give to suited aces and any other Ax hand that makes an A-high flush draw. I can't find a hand short of a set that I'm not even money against. At the time I thought "well, he's short, so I'm sure I'm getting good odds" but now it seems it's mathematically correct to stack off against even a full-buyin stack if they aren't an "over-value-the-crap-out-0f-suited-cards" type of player. Thoughts?

Only had 20 hands on villian; 20/9/1.25

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

UTG ($60.25)
UTG+1 ($209.55)
MP1 ($299.15)
MP2 ($216.55)
MP3 ($148.10)
CO ($195)
Hero ($204.75)
SB ($200)
BB ($190.80)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 8, A. UTG posts a blind of $2.
5 folds, Hero raises to $6, 1 fold, UTG (poster) calls $4.

Flop: ($13) 2, 5, 6 (3 players)
UTG checks, Hero bets $10, UTG raises to $54.25 (All-In), Hero calls $44.25.

Turn: ($121.50) 2 (3 players, 1 all-in)

River: ($121.50) 5 (3 players, 1 all-in)

Final Pot: $121.50