I fold a set again. :(

Villain is Kommisar_x - I have him at 11/15 over 200 hands. He is unnkown enough that I can't assume he'll run an elaborate bluff with a pair or two pair here. It's still really weired.
Turn donkshove was instant - less than a second.
I don't want to talk about pre pls. I messed that up... I blame it on the stars software.

$0.50/$1 Ante $0.20 No Limit Holdem
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($103)
UTG+1 ($303)
MP1 ($232)
MP2 ($203)
Hero ($87.35)
CO ($304)
BTN ($160)
SB ($100)
BB ($208)

Pre-Flop: ($3.30, 9 players) Hero is MP3
UTG calls $1, UTG+1 calls $1, MP1 calls $1, 1 fold, Hero raises to $5, 3 folds, BB calls $4, UTG calls $4, UTG+1 calls $4, MP1 calls $4

Flop: ($27.30, 5 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, Hero bets $18, BB calls $18, UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds

Turn: ($63.30, 2 players)
BB bets $90, Hero folds

Final Pot: $153.30

BB wins $150.30 (net +$37.10)

UTG lost $5.20
UTG+1 lost $5.20
MP1 lost $5.20
Hero lost $23.20

boring

What are you doing with 1/3 of the buyin fish.

But yeah good/standard

I buy in for 100 and stack up after a couple of orbits. Don't want to play deep against complete unknowns. I have just started playing on stars this week.

Originally Posted by oskar

I buy in for 100 and stack up after a couple of orbits. Don't want to play deep against complete unknowns. I have just started playing on stars this week.

Just put the auto top off on for 10bbs

I have stopped using auto top-off a couple of months ago because sometimes I want to keep a shorter stack and topping off manually isn't a big deal.

I think he shows you a bigger set or 4 outs to 2 pair a lot.

fine dude.

Originally Posted by Fnord

I think he shows you a bigger set or 4 outs to 2 pair a lot.

I don't understand the 4 outs to 2 pair, but I think you're right about the bigger sets.

Originally Posted by oskar

i don't understand the 4 outs to 2 pair, but i think you're right about the bigger sets.

76, 75, 65

I would bet bigger on the flop. Not sure what raise size you meant, but I think any raise pre is prob pretty bad and would just limp this.

Originally Posted by Renton

I would bet bigger on the flop. Not sure what raise size you meant, but I think any raise pre is prob pretty bad and would just limp this.

agree with this

Please fold.

I agree that pre is a call and sizing is terribul anyway... tbh I don't remember what went down there.

My reasoning for the flop sizing is that I really want to encourage one of those guys to raise me with 45, 56, A5s, 89, 78.
I guess 22 would be better still

And Guru, pls cut it out. You're bumping every other thread to post a one liner that is of no help to anyone.
It's ok when m2m does it because I respect his opinion
No clue who you are.

Originally Posted by Renton

I would bet bigger on the flop. Not sure what raise size you meant, but I think any raise pre is prob pretty bad and would just limp this.

Like the raise with certain table dynamics most common in live games.

Online, I don't like re-opening the betting or giving the blinds a chance to squeeze.