|
 Originally Posted by JeffreyGB
And BTW, Zangief, do you really consider 2/3 the pot to be a weak bet, specifically when talking in terms of large pots?
Not that weak, but not completely strong, either.
I guess I sort of see the bet amounts like this (related to a $25 pot):
$5 - either very weak or slowplaying a monster, possibly asking for an aggressive player to reraise without a hand
$10 - weak (or slowplaying)
$15 - not too weak, not too strong
$20-25 - strong
$30-35+ - very strong - "i have 2 pair" or "i'm over-protecting against a flush draw" or "i have trips" or "i'm representing trips and want to know if anyone else actually has them"
Note that I'm just talking about the flop bet. I expect turn bets to go down slightly in relation to the pot size.
Also note that I don't bet less when I'm worried about a big hand that hit the flop. I just bet the same amount and if I'm beat, I'm beat. I don't want to show weakness that tricky players can exploit.
When I build a big pot with a lot of callers like this and then still have a strong hand after the flop, I want to make it absolutely clear that this pot is mine. I think I do that by betting very close to the pot size. I don't want anyone messing with me by minraising me without a hand.
I really just think $20 sends a clearer message than $15.
Of course, I could be totally off with this. This is really the first time I am putting these assumptions of mine into words. I'd like to hear other opinions.
Edit: You should also probably keep in mind that you're probably more of a winning player online than I am. I win consistently at the casino, but have been losing consistently online. I'm working on this, I think it is differences between my games. So take my advice with that large grain of salt.
What I've described has worked for me at casinos. Hands like these where eveyone and their mother calls and you take it down on the flop are quite profitable for me.
Man, I'm long-winded after a "beer bash" at work. Sorry, bub.
|