Yeah, i really only noticed that your opp's were loose, not that they were LAGGY. I also forgot many of the offsuit connecting hands that either villan could be holding. All in all, my earlier post was a "long but incomplete" analysis. No offense taken.

How do these hands play to a $50 c-bet? How do they play to a check?
1. Axs for TPNK
a). to a c-bet, these hands will usually raise, and sometimes call.
b). when checked to, these hands will usually bet, and sometimes check.

2. PP's lower than 77 with one diamond for a weak flush draw
a). to a c-bet, these hands will usually fold, sometimes call, and sometimes raise.
b). when checked to, these hands will almost always bet. Obviously they would much rather steal this on the flop than play their hand as a weak flush.

3. T9o with one diamond for a weak but tempting combo draw
a). to a c-bet, these hands will probably call/raise equal %'s of the time.
b). when checked to, these hands will usually bet, and sometimes check.

4. suited diamond connectors or gappers for the flush
a). to a c-bet, (unless they are holding Qd-Jd) i think they are trying to get AI on this flop.
b). when checked to, these hands will almost always bet, rarely check.

5. maybe 88 for set
I agree this is probably the only set combination that either villan could be holding. But, same as the flopped flushes, i think this hand is trying to get AI on the flop, and always betting if checked to.

I think multitablings dangers are far outweighed by the rewards of being able to play against 50+ players at once.

Results? (not that they matter )