This is a hand I played a few months ago (when I was more of a newbie, though a winning one) which was brought up in conversation tonight and led to a considerable argument about correct tactics. Please let me know what you think of my play, and what you think drease (my only read was that he was a solid, ABC player) held:


Game #738773213: Texas Hold'em No Limit (£0.15/£0.25) - 2005/06/05 - 18:28:53 (UK)

Table "Pavan" Seat 6 is the button.
Seat 1: llamaman (£59 in chips)
Seat 2: Anto23094 sits out
Seat 4: martinii (£31.65 in chips)
Seat 5: drease (£72.80 in chips)
Seat 6: Zevs99 (£19.60 in chips)
Seat 8: Markelby (£47.76 in chips)
Seat 9: Igotnufin (£13.50 in chips)
Seat 10: Nomisg (£26.35 in chips)
Markelby: posts small blind £0.15
Igotnufin: posts big blind £0.25

----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to Markelby [Qs 2s]
Nomisg: calls £0.25
llamaman: folds
martinii: folds
drease: calls £0.25
Zevs99: folds
Markelby: calls £0.10
Igotnufin: checks

----- FLOP ----- [2h Qh Ts]
Markelby: checks
Igotnufin: checks
Nomisg: checks
drease: bets £5
Markelby: raises to £10
Anto23094 sits back
Igotnufin: folds
Nomisg: folds
drease: raises to £72.55 and is all-in
Markelby: is all-in £37.51
Returned uncalled bets £25.04 to drease


(I apologise for the lack of a hand converter - the zerodivide converter doesn't support Crypto/William Hill histories)