|
I think the villain was holding KT of spades.
I think the villain was an idiot because he overbet the river, but not because he was ignoring the 'possible board pairing.' I think the villain didn't have a clear read on dr3w321, but was well aware of a possible trips or lower flush because of the limp-in preflop. Perhaps the villain was hoping to look like he had a one-spade draw, and was bluffing at the missed river. But the villain did get an additional $3 out of a flush board -- scoreboard! And to put a different twist on what dalecooper said, in $25NL, plenty of people will pay off that stupid river bet, just not andr3w321.
I think I am being redundant here, because I'm already on the record here at FTR for saying "Slow Playing Sucks". But I'll say it again, slow playing sucks. But to disagree with myself, one may slow play the nuts if one is able to fold the ex-nuts.
Let's turn the question around (coop, fnord, et al) -- other than the overbet river, how best could the villain have played his possible flopped nut flush?
And, good fold andr3w321 ! Don't be a hater .
Is asshat a verb?
|