Sets against Maniacs = -> $$$

This guy had been betting like mad at any sign of weakness for an hour without too much damage to his stack - 'til now:

Party Poker Pot-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (9 handed) converter

MP2 ($25.9)
MP3 ($23.1)
CO ($11.46)
Button ($39.75)
SB ($22.25)
BB ($17.85)
UTG ($61.6)
UTG+1 ($33.9)
IJ ($24.25)

Preflop: IJ is MP1 with J, J. SB posts a blind of $0.1.
2 folds, IJ raises to $0.85, 1 fold, MP3 calls $0.85, CO calls $0.85, 1 fold, SB (poster) calls $0.75, 1 fold.

Flop: ($3.65) 3, J, Q (4 players)
SB checks, IJ checks, MP3 bets $2, CO calls $2, SB folds, IJ calls $2.

Turn: ($9.65) 7 (3 players)
IJ checks, MP3 bets $5, CO folds, IJ raises to $12, MP3 calls $7.

River: ($33.65) Q (2 players)
IJ bets $7, MP3 calls $8.25 (All-In), IJ calls $1.25.

Final Pot: $50.15

Results in white below:
IJ has Jd Js (full house, jacks full of queens).
MP3 has Qh Ah (three of a kind, queens).
Outcome: IJ wins $50.15.

This is why I love maniacs when I do hit a monster against them .

It makes up for all the folding while I wait for it.............

He doesnt look like a maniac in this hand at all. Looks more like a case of a better hand vs a good hand that couldn't let go/got committed on the river. This hand could've happened to about anybody.