|
 Originally Posted by Iconoclastic
Why did you raise preflop with KQc? I wouldn't have raised because it's almost a drawing hand and I would have to fold to a reraise fearing domination.
I feel that you are completely wrong, in my opinion. You need to raise with KQ to get a feel for what others have, be it a re-raise, a call, or a fold. By not betting you have no idea what your up against. Your argument also states that I should not raise AKs because it is a drawing hand? One point I do agree with is that you should fold to a big re-raise most certainly with KQo. A possible call would be logical for KQs.
 Originally Posted by Iconoclastic
By not raising you can still call a raise and hope to hit two pair/str8/flush on flop or outplay them postflop.
Why call a raise, when you can be the raiser and make them be the caller? If they raise you big you know where they stand in hand ranking. Being the raiser is usually a good thing. (Also, with KQo, I certainly hope you don't hope to catch a flush...)
 Originally Posted by Iconoclastic
But raising preflop with a hand that you wouldn't be comfortable going all in with is a questionable move, in my opinion.
This statement is wise for LATE tourney play. (3 people or less) Otherwise this logic is simply flawed. You're also saying that I shouldn't raise QQ-99. I feel you have to raise these, but I certainly wouldn't want to go all in with these preflop. Your logic only works for 2 hands in this game. AA and KK. If anyone played that tight they wouldn't be a good poker player!!
That's my 2 chips. Err, cents.
|