|
hand 1: i'd call this of course even if BB has aces, he could be doing this with TT+, AQs+ to isolate the shortstack so you're probably ahead.
hand 2: it's tough it looks like Villain 1 has QQ/KK/AA and Villain 2 would make this play with jacks (3's also possible). The betting action looks like Villain 1 is betting his overpair while you are slowplaying and trying to keep all of you in the pot. Villain 1 certainly doesn't have JJ, since he'd be slowplaying i guess, at least the flop. The only hard thing to do is the situation if Villain 2 calls the all-in bet, because that's the pretty standard way to play top set, especially if someone agressively bets into you. I'd call anyway (crying, mind you) and gave myself around 25% chance i'm ahead. wouldn't mind a fold also.
hand3: first thing, bet the flop, you have position. as played, i'd call his value bet and value bet pot if checked to everytime, but the problem is, you can't possibly push since the only thing the calls you are quad aces (unamused KK every full moon, but that's very rare) so you're pretty much stuck. i'd probably call his push, but that's because i have quads and i'm stubborn, but i seriously doubt that i'm ahead here, the way that hand has been played. It looks like scared KK (from which, you're not going to get money with an all-in, a sizeable value bet would be fine) or AA (which got there on the river). What i don't get is that if you put him on AA/KK you have a 50% chance to get the money no matter what you do on the turn (he's not folding nut boat) and 50% chance you're not getting any (KK). I don't see why check behind there. If i'm certain villain has AA/KK, i'd really overbet the turn, just to get his boat all-in, if he has it.
p.s.: i'd try that with nut quads, pushing all-in on the river, because 99,99% of the time the other player hasn't got squat and you're likely to make money from quad aces if you play it like a bluff, maybe get an angry KK to put you on QQ and call.
i'd really like to see results
|