I would agree with Ron if there was one fewer broadway card on the flop. Frequently a call PF will contain two broadway cards so I would be cautious in this spot, sure you could be ahead but you are easily way behind in a spot like that: AQ, AJ, QJ, KT, etc. -- hands that you beat that might take this line would be diamond draws, A10 and down. I suppose it's possible villain could have KQ or KJ, but I don't see it as being as likely considering PF action and the raise.

I disagree that after a check-raise people are usually weak, considering this board. if the board was more raggy or paired I would agree about the check-raise being potentially weak, as its often a move people make to push off someone cbetting. But in this case you raised preflop so on a board like this you are very likely to have connected from opponents perspective. He expects you to continue betting.

And the c/r of a dollar looks more like newb pot building to me than a move -- a move would need at least $3

People will sometimes check the nuts, 2p, trips after a c/r because they can be scared of 'scaring you off' or think because you liked your hand on the flop, that you will bet again and they can potentially c/r once more.

I like it as played. Villain acted weak hoping you would do his pot building, which is a dumb but imo common line at these stakes (ppl love to slowplay at smaller stakes and often will not aggressively bet their good hands).

oh, and wait before posting results so quickly so replies are given without knowledge of outcome.