weak fold?

I had no reads. pre flop I was limping for two pair or better, but the J and T freaked me out. Did he hit his kicker or is this just a weak fold since he could be on a draw, have weaker KKK, or just two pair?

PokerStars Pot-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

UTG ($13.40)
UTG+1 ($36.05)
MP1 ($60.35)
MP2 ($5)
MP3 ($22.25)
CO ($18.25)
Hero ($31.05)
SB ($20.30)
BB ($24.95)

Preflop: Hero is Button with K, Q.
1 fold, UTG+1 calls $0.25, MP1 calls $0.25, MP2 calls $0.25, MP3 calls $0.25, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.25, 1 fold, BB checks.

Flop: ($1.60) K, J, K (6 players)
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, MP3 bets $0.75, Hero raises to $2.75, BB folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 calls $2.

Turn: ($7.10) T (2 players)
MP3 checks, Hero bets $4.85, MP3 raises to $19.25, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $31.20

What's your read? At these levels against unknown I'd say it's very weak.

Weak. What range of hands that he's playing beats you? KJ, KT, JJ? Again, at these levels, I'd think he probably has Kx. AK or AQ seem unlikely, unless he's been very passive. Or maybe I'm underestimating the play at $25 NL these days.

yea id also scratch off AK/AQ. My range (after thinking more clearly) is something like Ax spades or hearts, KJ/KT, Q9, QT, K2-K9s

WOW, uber weak:

Board: Ks Js Kh Th
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 70.8414 % 66.01% 04.84% { KcQd }
Hand 2: 29.1586 % 24.32% 04.84% { AhJh, AsJs, AhTh, AsTs, Ah9h, As9s, Ah8h, As8s, Ah7h, As7s, Ah6h, As6s, Ah5h, As5s, Ah4h, As4s, Ah3h, As3s, Ah2h, As2s, KhJh, KsJs, KhTh, KsTs, K9s-K2s, QTs-Q9s, QTo-Q9o }

I think I had some weird tilt effect from taking some terrible beats in a tourny right before.

OMG CALL CALL CALL

haha...i know. lesson learned: playing scared sucks. no more poker tonight.

I think if you are folding to a cr here, you should check behind on turn.

I must be playing a lot of 6 max....

No raise with KQ on the button here???

i think a nut camper plays that