I know that there are pros and cons for both but I was just wondering what would be more productive considering you only have a $100 bankroll.
Printable View
I know that there are pros and cons for both but I was just wondering what would be more productive considering you only have a $100 bankroll.
Um not enough for either, sry.
productible, i like it.
I like the invention of that word, nice win in that SNG versus bax and that JJprodigy tool.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmxicle
K bye, where are my HH?
i didn't win it i came in scgolfer place and, and i've been lazy cause i don't know that i can send a 800 mb db over email haha.
I think we can do it over IRC
Try $5 sngs. Best to play at a site with only 10% rake.
Stop with the random comments guys, YOU ARE NOT BEING PRODUCTIBLE
You need at LEAST $130 to play 10NL
So $10 sngs....$300 plus should cover it?? Is 6 max or 9 better??. I wanna produce maximum results!! By the way since there is no basic strategy on $1/2 because fishes will call anything. How do you subsidize the bad beats???
You can definately see her nipples. I'm scared.
Off5th, please change your avatar.
No nudity is allowed.
-'rilla
with 100 you cant play either of those limits, probably have to start at 10nl
'rilla did i miss some nudity?
damn
damn
and double double damn
I would push 5.50's at stars or something and when you reach 150 you oculd play .25/.50 but i dont even see that as a good idea.
Stick to SNG"S
by having a solid winrate, which is a tough thing to get in limit HE for many people. It takes tens of thousands of hands to really see where you stand,Quote:
Originally Posted by Off5th
with $100 i'd play $5 sngs