I just started 3-tabling 6-max 50NL and was wondering how unrealistic keeping my winrate for 2500 hands at 23PTBB/100 hands is...
- sed
Printable View
I just started 3-tabling 6-max 50NL and was wondering how unrealistic keeping my winrate for 2500 hands at 23PTBB/100 hands is...
- sed
I hit 22bb/100 over 8k hands only two tabelling but varience has kicked my ass lately down to 10bbs.
I think, finding the right site and making the most of strategy means that your winrate is sustainable over about 15k hands. After that i think you'll get nipped in the bud like i did.
Very very unrealistic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sed
well, as a followup... what is realistic?
- sed
i would tend to disagree with arkana and say that it would be
realistic, for 4 tables 50nl i had just under 18ptbb/100.
although my sample size was only about 9000 hands.
really depends on the times you are playing more than
anythign
Im still going to say that 10-20bbs/100 at multi tabelling 50nl is posible over 10k+ hands providing you can identify weakness and take oppertunities. A few nice flops would help but i think you can
sigh...
10k hands is nowhere near long term! Come back when you have 100k hands.
i moved up
yes i know its a small number
100k gives you a good idea, 200k is a good sample size.
Winrates are useless, just make sure you play all your hands well and the money will come.
It is pretty funny that when you start playing you think that 500 or at least a thousand hands is a good sample size but after a year of play and tens of thousands of hands you just realize that the sample size has to be huge, especially for NL and especially for short handed.
2500 is a realy small sample and therefor its very hard to get any solid info about future win rates from it. As said, a good number would be 100-200k, perhaps more for shorthanded games.
A winrate will tell you some of the quality, but you hafto put that in the context of the quantity. Many have one, but not both.
After that little rant, all I can say is that you are a winning player and I think your going to stay a winning player.
yeah, I know that 2500 is small... and I have doubled the hand-count since I posted this originally and the winrate has dropped slightly to 22.6BB/100. I know that I am running hot now (I've had AA almost 50% more times than I should have over this stretch) but wanted to see what the concensus was for how much a good player should be earning. In limit, there are guidelines as to what is a good/excellent win-rate. I was just wondering what I should shoot for in NL 6-max. That is all...
Please no more comments about small sample size, I feel like I need to go buy a sportscar or something to compensate...
- sed
I would say a great player could do about 15PT/BB at the lower levels (25NL and 50NL) and about 10PT/BB rate at 100NL+ over 200k+ hands. Personally I think 5PT/BB at 100NL+ is quite good.
Cool, so 15PT/100BB it is. If I discount my excessive AA rate, that is around where I am running. I'll get back to ya'll in about 97.5k hands....
- sed
I had a £25NL win rate of 46PTBB/100 over 6,000 hands. I felt like I was god :)