Do you like this play?

Pawnit is consevative, a little passive. Bitches about people making bad calls.

Pouchi is a fishy guy. Really passive on flops, but really overvalues hands on turn and river. Capable of checking top pair on flop. Very loose preflop. Might even call with mid-pair.

Game #1327104792 - (blinds $0.10/$0.25) No Limit Texas Hold'em - 2006/03/04-13:36:51.8 (CST) Table "Quoy (5 max)" (real money) -- Seat 2 is the button Seat 2: redgrape ($21.25 in chips) Seat 3: pawnit2 ($22.10 in chips) Seat 4: f2xxx ($21.38 in chips) Seat 5: pouchi ($63.14 in chips) pawnit2 : Post Small Blind ($0.10)
f2xxx : Post Big Blind ($0.25)
Dealing...
Dealt to redgrape [ Qh ]
Dealt to redgrape [ Ah ]
pouchi : Call ($0.25)
redgrape: Raise ($1.30)
pawnit2 : Call ($1.20)
f2xxx : Fold
pouchi : Call ($1.05)
*** FLOP *** : [ Kh 5h 9d ]
pawnit2 : Bet ($2.20)
pouchi : Call ($2.20)
redgrape: Raise ($19.95)


What do you think?

I think making semi-bluffs into to loose-passives and guys who bitch about bad calls might not be MAXIMALLY +EV.

You easily are getting pot odds here, and might fold some worse hands (2 hearts).
Unless you are sure that you will NOT get paid if a heart falls (and you flat call flop and possibly turn), I'm not sure I like this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zenbitz

I think making semi-bluffs into to loose-passives and guys who bitch about bad calls might not be +EV.

---

I have little doubt pushing here is +EV. The question is does this line makes us the most money against these particular opponents?