Difference between learning and being told what to do
Before I begin, this is posted here because it is mainly applicable to the posts one sees in the Beginners Forum.
OK, I have been thinking about this for some time now. This first came to my attention in someone's blog here; I think it was Lukie's. It was a discussion on why you don't see the top notch players posting much in forums because they either know everything or want to figure out ideas for themselves. It's something along those lines, anyways here it goes, this could be somewhat controversial due to recent events however I think this is an important concept:
Sometimes you just have to figure things out for yourself
It's pretty simple, but for the most part at this forum I do not see this happening. I’m not criticizing anyone. I especially do not want the veteran posters who answer every single noob question to feel attacked by this. However, at what point do we stop getting fed the answers and actually go out and find them ourselves?
Sure, there are some extremely complex situations which elicit great debates. However, the countless endless stream of repetitiveness is starting to become somewhat ridiculous. I hope some of the newer members of FTR catch this and take the advice:
You will become hugely more successful at poker if you take the initiative to teach yourself
Until you sit down, analyze a hand, a line, a tournament, an anything, you will not fully understand the complex concepts of the game. It is just that simple. Having one of the veteran players tell you why you should have folded KJ to a push or why opening an Ace on the button is automatic will never make you a great poker player. You yourself need to look at this situation and determine WHY a certain play is the RIGHT play. Until you do this you will never truly improve at poker. Poker is not a buddy system, FTR is a great place to bounce ideas around but should not a place for holding your hand when you walk across the street.
What the beginners/strugglers need to realize is that poker is a game where you get what you put into it. If you put some hard work, time, and effort into your game, it will improve. If you come in here, ask questions you could have answered yourself, get a cookie-cutter answer, and remain stagnant in your abilities you only have yourself to blame.
I would like to see this happen more often:
1. A beginner has a question, he/she wants to post it here/in NL strats/in SNG's/etc...
2. Before the beginner hits the 'submit' button he/she actually goes and researches the topic. Wether it be using our search engine, other forums, Poker Books, or any other article.
3. The beginner then answers his/her own question in their post.
4. Member then analyze this
I really see this as a much more constructive way to learn a concept. I know the "beginner" forum is here to be open to any questions and for us to provide the answers. However, I have to wonder:
How good of a service are we really providing?
Do veteran members just stating the same answer to the same question actually produce any true improvement? I think not. From now on I think this forum should take a more Socratic method.
Let's start answering questions with questions.
Re: Difference between learning and being told what to do
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin_476
However, the countless endless stream of repetitiveness is starting to become somewhat ridiculous.
:lol: :lol: when did you register????
