2 Interesting River Spots vs Same Villain
I almost timed out on the river in hand 1 deciding whether to value-bet or not.
What do you do on the river in hand 2 based on the action in hand 1 (i.e. villain’s passive play OOP)? The paradox is villain coming out and firing OOP in hand 2 vs his check-calling a strong hand in hand 1. Does this mean I put him on a weaker or a stronger hand? Does it tell me he likes his hand MORE or LESS? I felt a huge donkish urge to minraise the river in hand 2 FWIW.
Hand 1 :
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 4: Ricochet177 ( $242.75 )
Seat 5: Bagadu ( $624.90 )
Seat 3: HERO ( $370.65 )
Seat 1: oOkayplayer ( $237.85 )
Seat 2: Pavel55 ( $233 )
Seat 6: Comaz5 ( $176.55 )
Bagadu posts small blind [$1].
Comaz5 posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ As 9h ]
oOkayplayer folds.
Pavel55 folds.
HERO raises [$7]
Ricochet177 folds.
Bagadu calls [$6]
Comaz5 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 4s, Ah, 9s ]
Bagadu checks.
HERO bets [$15]
Bagadu calls [$15]
** Dealing Turn ** [ Ts ]
Bagadu checks.
HERO bets [$41]
Bagadu calls [$41]
** Dealing River ** [ Qd ]
Bagadu checks.
HERO bets [$66]
Bagadu calls [$66]
HERO shows [ As, 9h ]two pairs, Aces and Nines.
Bagadu shows [ Ac, Tc ]two pairs, Aces and Tens.
Bagadu wins $256.50 from the main pot with two pairs, Aces and Tens.
Hand 2 :
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 5: Bagadu ( $765.25 )
Seat 3: HERO ( $234.60 )
Seat 1: oOkayplayer ( $234.85 )
Seat 2: Pavel55 ( $220.10 )
Seat 6: Comaz5 ( $209.25 )
Seat 4: SpecTickle ( $200 )
Bagadu posts small blind [$1].
Comaz5 posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ Ad Ah ]
oOkayplayer folds.
Pavel55 folds.
HERO raises [$7]
Bagadu calls [$6]
Comaz5 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 6c, Jc, 5s ]
Bagadu checks.
HERO bets [$11]
Bagadu raises [$22]
HERO calls [$11]
** Dealing Turn ** [ Qh ]
Bagadu bets [$28]
HERO calls [$28]
** Dealing River ** [ 7s ]
Bagadu bets [$33]
HERO…
