Dont go broke with baby flushes, right?

I think I might be too nitty for my own good. Villain is 50/20 but not particularly aggressive postflop. Huge c/r on the river = the nutz, right?

Absolute Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
4 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $96.20
Button: $20.50
SB: $21.90
Hero: $52.35

Pre-flop: (4 players) Hero is BB with 5 :club: 4 :club:
2 folds, SB raises to $0.5, Hero calls.

Flop: 3 :club: Q :club: 2 :club: ($1, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.75, SB calls.

Turn: K :heart: ($2.5, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $2, SB calls.

River: 6 :heart: ($6.5, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $7, SB raises all-in $18.65, Hero folds.

I'm a fish, I call this.

I call

Damnit fnord, I called too. Youre supposed to tell me its my fault I'm losing.

against a 50/20 you can't get away from this.

Of course you called you're getting 3:1 against all hands that were sweating another club.

Your getting 2-1 on your money, at such low limits there are so many bad players that i could for sure seing them make this same move with KQ, K6, 22, 33, 66, QQ or even 77-JJ, AQ with one club, they might even think they're trapping you, its a tough call i wouldn't falt you for calling or folding. I'd lean more to a call though but late in a tourny though i'd fold.

I'm actually surprised to see a river c/r all-in at 25nl.

As someone who plays at these levels, I'd check behind on river and fold as played (without a read). C/c on the flop and c/c turn on a mono board is a flush or big A, since I'd have to fold to a c/r, I'd just check the river.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Warpe

I'm actually surprised to see a river c/r all-in at 25nl.

---

Pretty common actually since they all love to slowplay their monsters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yorib

since I'd have to fold to a c/r, I'd just check the river.

---

That's just silly. If worse hands are calling quite often it's a really easy bet/fold.

Fnord: I'm just saying how I'd play, I'm not saying it's right, and I 100% see where you are coming from. Personally, I hate to be blown off of hands which is why I check behind more than I should. Especially at sites/tables where people are more prone to bluffing.

I'd call, I mean you have the flush AND the straight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yorib

Fnord: I'm just saying how I'd play, I'm not saying it's right, and I 100% see where you are coming from. Personally, I hate to be blown off of hands which is why I check behind more than I should. Especially at sites/tables where people are more prone to bluffing.

---

Just saying that this is a pretty big leak.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fnord

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yorib

Fnord: I'm just saying how I'd play, I'm not saying it's right, and I 100% see where you are coming from. Personally, I hate to be blown off of hands which is why I check behind more than I should. Especially at sites/tables where people are more prone to bluffing.

---

Just saying that this is a pretty big leak.

---

QFT.
Yeah yorib that makes no sense. Knowing what's right to do and not doing it is something you should probably look at.

Quote:

---

Knowing what's right to do and not doing it is something you should probably look at.

---

:D :D :D

Meh, I think it's just a matter of not thinking in terms of NLHE.

When the pot is big you are losing even more value when you pass up on a +EV bet. The people who crush NLHE are the ones that get the most value when the pot is big.

I call, I've seen many a TAG get stressed when his Ac has missed before.