54s 200NL

How,u like my play here against a tag?
Its probably standard, but im not sure if leading is better here on the turn or not.

** Game ID 1686824964 starting - 2007-10-25 22:57:42
** Argentine [Hold em] (1.00|2.00 No Limit - Cash Game) Real Money
- falck99 sitting in seat 1 with $634.50
- Nadjapigen1 sitting in seat 2 with $293.12
- mrmount sitting in seat 3 with $19.00
- sjefen2 sitting in seat 4 with $55.36
- Dislexsik sitting in seat 5 with $200.00
- skaidrite sitting in seat 6 with $130.50 [Dealer]
falck99 posted the small blind - $1.00
Nadjapigen1 posted the big blind - $2.00
** Dealing card to Dislexsik: 5 of Hearts, 4 of Hearts
mrmount folded
sjefen2 folded
Dislexsik raised - $8.00
skaidrite called - $8.00
falck99 folded
Nadjapigen1 folded
** Dealing the flop: 6 of Diamonds, 9 of Diamonds, Queen of Hearts
Dislexsik bet - $14.00
skaidrite called - $14.00
** Dealing the turn: 7 of Hearts
Dislexsik checked
skaidrite bet - $24.52
Dislexsik went all-in - $178.00

I've been trying to chime in a little more in hand history posts, but my track record at 50nl has been mediocre at best so take my advice for what its worth. With no previous history with opponent I think this is good, his turn bet is pretty weak so shoving over here is good. A normal raise to 75-80ish pot commits you so you might as well get it in here. The only thing I worry about here is his weak turn bet designed to an induce a shove?

i like double barrelling more than c/r turn here.

why is the 7h a good card to double-barrell semi-bluff though?

I like a double-barrel better because that's what you would do with AQ/KQ/QQ. Plus it saves you money if he calls and you miss.

i like it because most draws havent yet got there (JT/78) (and i think get bad odds?) and calling off with tptk is quite risky here for opp, although because of position you can be semi-bluffing more here than if you opened UTG for example.

the shove is a huge overbet, I also prefer a double barrel. If you did have a good hand, I don't think you are just shoving like that