to the good players -win rates

whats a decent win rate at 2/4 pls. what are you guys earning.

i played 15000 hands last week and ended up 5800 in profit, (after a shaky start). i think i went on a heater though, and would like some comparables. i have nothing to compare to as this is my first week playing cash.

im trying to figure out if a reasonable salary is attainable playing medium stakes multi tabling 4(5 tables max), or if i just sucked it up all week and experienced a tidal wave of positive variance ( i also made loads of errors )which is i feel is probably the likely situation over this small sample size.

if it stays this good, then im not going back to playing an mtt schedule, and its time to crack open the champers and get the crack whores in :D

also i can save an image, but how do i paste it into here. i want to post my pokertracker stats for analysis. is this possible

thanks peeps

You may want to start here. This has been a running conversation for years and this thread is the latest

http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...=61800&start=0

You're going to get a lot of vague responses regarding the answer to your winrate. The usual are: if you're winning be happy, play what stakes you're comfortable winning at, varience is to huge to even begin factoring your winrate until beyond 100k hands sample, etc.

It's a really tough question to answer. So basically, if you feel you're playing your best and feel you are better than these guys and are bringing in money, then that's what's important. Your sample size is way too small to figure anything except how you've run the past few weeks really. There have been discussions before about how it's quite likely for someone to run bad for as long as 100k hands.

Anyway, the question I can answer: Upload an image to a photo site like imageshack.com or photobucket.com. Then take the link to said photo and type it out like this:

Code:

---

http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i120/Galapog0s/PR.jpg

---

It comes out like this:
http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i120/Galapog0s/PR.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Galapogos

It comes out like this:
http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i120/Galapog0s/PR.jpg

---

I never knew you were black?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms

I never knew you were black?

---

Fo shizzle ma nizzle.

damn thats one fishy table

thnks gal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clarkatroid

thnks gal

---

Winrates are silly terms b/c variance is crazy (standard dev blah blah blah). Anyways, I'd take $200/1k hands at $400nl and be pretty happy about that. That means if you 4-5table for 100 hours a month you can make yourself nearly 10k after rb/bonus.

Damn, that sounds nice, gonna have to do that one day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill

damn thats one fishy table

---

Standard Pokerroom table under $100NL.

LOL at you Gal. for leaving avatars on.

Also, the table looks like a goldmine, but it's not that great because you are constantly seeing the flop multi-way. I'd rather have a couple nits sit at the table so that I could go HU with the fish more often.

Oh and I just noticed you use the same ranking system as me!
Green dots for the fish, and Green + dots for the UBER fish...haha that's awesome!

Don't expect your winrate to be over 3ptBB/100

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill

damn thats one fishy table

---

Standard Pokerroom table under $100NL.

---

Actually now that I'm back at 100NL I forgot how awful those guys are. I swear they are easily worse than the 25NL and 50NL players. I'm getting like 1-2 cold callers of my 3-bets that are hoping to hit sets or make flushes.

I think maybe it's because because $100 tables are just kind of a number that attracts the one time gamblers. And 25NL - 50NL are guys that are genuinely trying to improve their game. Then again, the regs do a lot of dumb shit too.

Multitabling 400NL at the eurosites (4+ tables) I think 3 is good, 4 is achievable (sp?), 5 possible, 6+ sick awesome.

And really anything above 0 is way more than the average player.

its a totally theoretical number that almost no one ever truly finds out.

theoretically speaking, 6+ can be done as only as you game select really hard, grind really hard (don't tilt like ever), and focus on few tables.

the game selection part is probably the most important of all, and is probably accountable for 2-3 points of your winrate.