1 hand @ 10nl ak 3-bet oop vs 2 Vs

Edit: removed hands 1, 3
Hand 2)
$0.05/$0.1 No Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG M.Ramda ($22.40)
UTG+1 zxqv8 ($14.85)
CO UpStageMe ($11.80)
BTN DreamHoly ($9.65)
SB wingshooter2 ($18.35)
BB Hero ($11.80)

Pre-flop: ($0.15, 6 players) Hero is BB :ac: :kh:
M.Ramda raises to $0.4, 3 folds, wingshooter2 calls $0.35, Hero raises to $1.5, M.Ramda calls $1.1, wingshooter2 calls $1.1

Flop: :as: :qs: :5s: ($4.5, 3 players)
wingshooter2 checks, Hero checks, M.Ramda bets $4, wingshooter2 calls $4, Hero folds

hand 1 check turn behind
hand 2 bet flop
hand 3 it's not worth it, fold

Do I really gain anything from betting the flop in hand 2? 3-handed in a 3-bet pot, I don't see how I get action from anything I beat.

You'll get action from TT/JJ/KK where they have a spade.
There's also a good chance you'll fold out AQ.
But I hear your point, I just hate 3-betting pre and check folding an ace high flop. You're repping AA, right?

I can see the action from JJ+ w/ a spade, but if they flat, where the hell am I at on the turn? I'm still oop.

Also, folding out AQ is unlikely I think. The 4-out boat draw will get an AQ call from most V's at this limit. If they're still involved on the flop here with AQ, they are stacking off with it.

Hand 1: I'd check turn behind here, don't know if I'd call a river donk (small one maybe).

Hand 2: I think I'd let it go too (without a lead I mean, def. now after a bet and call). With the King of Spades in our hand I would certainly lead, but not now. With a lead I would want to take it down right there and shut down to further action. And because this flop hits their 3b calling range I would expect action and hence think a c-bet is spewy here. QQ, AQ, AK with K of spades, maybe 55 for the overcaller are all hands in their range, so clear fold after given action I think.

Hand 3: I wouldn't bother. Opps have silly stacks and probably call you down with a pretty wide range because they're bad :)