200NL - B/f vs C/c

No strong reads on villian, seems on the loose passive side.

$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
Hero ($340.85)
UTG 1 ($226.55)
CO ($479.75)
BTN ($200.15)
SB ($150.10)
BB ($214.95)

Pre-flop: ($3, 6 players) Hero is UTG :ks: :kc:
Hero raises to $8, UTG 1 calls $8, 4 folds

Flop: :th: :qc: :kd: ($19, 2 players)
Hero bets $14, UTG 1 calls $14

Turn: :8h: ($47, 2 players)
Hero bets $38, UTG 1 calls $38

River: :js: ($123, 2 players)
Hero bets $75, 1 fold

Final Pot: $123

Hero wins $195 ( won $60 )
UTG 1 lost -$60.00

I don't see how B/F could ever be the right choice here. I guess you might bluff out a 9? But hes not calling you down with 2pair here. A check call induces SOOOOO many bluffs in this spot and is such a extremely strong play.

Easy c/c. Nothing worse is calling this bet.

well he seemed to be REALLY passive, what made me hate c/c, coz he most likely checks back everything but Ax. Im almost sure he´d rather call with weaker, than bet with them if checked to.

b/f like half pot. hes probably not folding 2 pair to that if hes not good. and since hes passive i doubt he bluff raises.

c/cing seems bad if hes passive what do you hope he bluffs with here. hes not going to bet his 2 pair or w/e but he will call with it.

c/f?

don t think it really matters all that much

i d usually bet-fold though expecting a call every now and then from KJ JQ JT JJ type shit getting frisky and suspicious, esp from a passive villain (remember all the times you bluffed this spot with air and got called down by a set or 2 pr?)

$50

I'll make this bet with ATC against passive river players.

I think I prefer a small bet/fold or a c/f than a c/c