Help me steak sum1 (lc)

apologies in advance for shitty thread but your help is appreciated

Im considering staking a good friend to play either 100 or 200nl. he went 'pro' (read dropout of uni) on a $5k BR, since then he has had to drop down due to living expenses, bad run of cards, by quite a bit. Hes interested in a staking deal, where i fund him for the 200nl (or i prefer 100nl) he was at before he went pro for 50% of profits. my main question is...

in your opinion has mid stakes FR got significantly harder in the recent months? Noticeable different?

My mian concern is every1 at those stakes is: good ldo, but mainly takes the game fucking sersoiuly and does a shit load of studying (ie. the games are a lot tougher than he / me gives them credit for)/

fwiw, i honestly believe he was at least profitable at 200nl 5 months ago

k that was typed out drunk (deal was considered sober ldo), any other info missed out will happily be provided

frankly i wouldn't stake someone with such poor money management. This sounds like a losing proposition IMO.

winning players rarely need to be staked.

Think of it this way ... you will share in 50% of his winnings, and 100% of his losses.
You are also helping fund his laundry and toilet paper bills.

I would not invest in someone who's life plan was - drop out of a university to play poker professionally starting out with $5000 whether his name was Einstein or Forrest Gump. I wouldn't discourage him from giving it a go - but it doesn't sound like a solid 'investment'.

Now if you've got some money to blow, and this guy's a friend - then feel free - but consider it (privately) as a gift to your friend and if you get paid out of it - that's a bonus.

don't do it. if he isnt the type to fuck you over, just let him borrow money with a small % interest. this should be more +ev for both of you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by badgers

winning players rarely need to be staked.

---

This imo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by badgers

winning cash players rarely need to be staked.

---

FYP

fwiw, im gonna create an ccount with the money in, and he will transfer half the profits to his account say every week.

he needs staking cos he started off with only 30 buyins, and apparently went on a redic downswing (was saying that way before any mention of a steak fwiw)

altho hes an ex alcoholic. at the age of 23, and still drinks

30 buyin downswing :shock:

he didnt lose 5k he had to drop down to be reasonable

If he couldn't make it with 100% of his profits, how the hell can he make it on 50%?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaulPaul

altho hes an ex alcoholic. at the age of 23, and still drinks

---

This is all I will comment on.

A) There is NO! such thing as an "ex" Alcoholic. Ever, no exceptions. Only Recovering Alcoholics.

B)If he has a drinking problem, he needs to get help. But, that's neither here nor there. But that could be the reason for the "downswing" you're talking about.

op your a moron of your actually considering this.
staking in general is pretty stupid. get staked = begging for money. now think about the last time someone was begging
for money. i can't think of someone in my entire life ever
that was begging for money that i would ever even consider
giving money to. yeah, that's right fuck the red cross.

Dropping out of university to turn pro with a $5k roll? Pretty terrible life plan. Confirmed by the fact that he went broke.

Even the math says don't do it. 50% of -$5k (or $o profit) = you will be SOL if you stake him.

in order to correctly stake somebody who need to know what it takes to beat that stake and know that they have that

how do you have a 30 buy-in swing?!!! smells like poor playing to me...

Quote:

---

in order to correctly stake somebody who need to know what it takes to beat that stake and know that they have that

---

this is good advice, and probably what i wanted to hear