Printable View
Villians numbers are 21/17 after 10 orbits or so and he didnt 3bet once, average postflop agression.
http://www.holdemmanager.net
NL Holdem $1(BB) IPoker Game#1200326720
ThoB11 ($164)
AymKK ($114)
Hero ($102)
Soulcreeper ($106)
ThoB11 posts (SB) $0.50
AymKK posts (BB) $1
Dealt to Hero 9c Ad
Hero raises to $3
call, call, fold,
FLOP ($10) Qd 3s 9s
check, check, check,
TURN ($10) Qd 3s 9s As
ThoB11 bets $7
Raise, fold to a re-raise.
this, but I can only put AQ/99/33 in his range that beats us, depending on "how it feels" I might felt thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
raising is ridiculously exploitable (cause he can just shove on you everytime and you'll never call) but if he's not gonna exploit it go ahead and raise
raising seems bad, but so does calling because alot of villains range is pair + FD's. i think i like calling better though because we just cant call a shove vs this villain.
I would call this like 90% of the time depending on the guy
Yah me too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanglow
Raise folding seems.. I don't know... kinda dirty here.
I probably just call turn and call blank river. Probably fold a spade river and possibly turn my hand into a bluff if checks a spade river, but probably not.
raising is certainly wrong in theory. unless you have a pretty good feel for how this guy hand reads and plays, calling is gonna be the better option.
also, i think you should cbet this flop
Then surely its the folding thats exploitable. But again if hes not gonna exploit it who cares.Quote:
Originally Posted by Massimo
My standard would be to c/bet this flop. As played I would just call the turn bet.
I like a raise because our line looks like total bullshit and I like throwing lines like that out every now and then to fustrate hand readers.
If he's aggro enough to shove a wide range, then just call.