Printable View
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/hof09/...ory?id=3827833
I'd rather have Tim Raines than Rice, who is one of the most overrated players in history. Congrats to Rickey though. I can't believe 28 guys didn't vote for him.
http://www.astrosdaily.com/history/e...son_Rickey.jpg
Baseball in the Commune, FTW!
I am the greatest!
didn't read the article, but didn't Rice get snubbed by a few votes last year and this is his final chance? If so, give it to him. Raines will get it eventually.
Now if we want to talk about who should be in the HOF, lets get Charlie Hustle on there as a write in!
Jim Rice one of the most overrated in history? Really? Why? He was a career .300 hitter and one of the guys pitchers really didn't want to face in his day.
Can't hide my obvious Red Sox bias, but really? Tim Raines over Jim Rice? Make a case...
Don't get me started on the bullshit that is Hall of Fame Voting, especially in baseball.
PETE ROSE I TELL YOU!!!!
I'd vote for Rose over all these wannabe's
rice is awesome /case.
The fact that there were 5% of voters who didn't vote for Henderson proves that the whole process is a joke.
It's ridiculous that there will never be a player voted unanimously into the HOF.
jeter?Quote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
*fist pump*Quote:
Originally Posted by bode
http://www.fansedge.com/Images/Produ...45-02990-F.jpg
jim rice was about as dominant a player as could be in his time...definitely HOF worthy.
nopeQuote:
Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
lol @ suggesting Jeter will be 100%. He's the most overrated player in baseball.
benny is obv yankee fan with head up ass
I agree its a total joke. Woulda said Roger Clemens mighta been near 100% but that ship has sailed. So ya, I don't know if anyone ever will be. Baseball as a whole has sooo many problems, the HOF voting is just another to add to the pile.
Tim Raines over Jim Rice is nothing but personal choice. I liked Raines a whole lot better as a kid.Quote:
Originally Posted by allabout
As for Jim Rice being one of the overrated in history, absostinkinlutely. You're not going to like me writing this if you're part of the Nation, but when looking over his candidacy fairly you have to consider that all the Red Sox hitters from the late 70s (Dewey Evans, Fred Lynn, Rice) had their stats inflated by playing in Fenway. You ever heard of a stat called a Park Factor? It's a way of looking at what runs the teams scored in a particular park vs. all the other parks and determining if it's a pitcher's park or a hitter's park. A score of 100 is neutral, with anything above indicating it's a park favoring hitters and below favoring pitchers. (Sorry for making it basic if you're familiar, I'm not sure who knows what about baseball around here). From 1973 to 1979, Fenway's Park Factor is about 110, clearly in hitter's park territory. And Rice benefitted tremendously from that. Over his career, he hit .320 at Fenway, with a .374 on-base percentage and a .546 slugging percentage. On the road, he only hit .277/.330/.459. That's a huge difference.
Carl Yastrzemski was similarly beefed up by Fenway. I've got no problem with Yaz's election though, since he had huge career numbers. Discount his 3400 hits and 1850 RBI and he's still got huge numbers. Discount Rice similarly though, and his 2400 hits and 1450 RBI look pretty meh. Andre Dawson had 2774 and 1591 and he's even struggling to get in. Dave Parker had 2712 and 1492. Harold baines put up 2866 and 1628. Rusty Staub even had more hits and RBI than Rice in his career. None of those three even sniffed the HOF.
Long story short, dude looks a lot better than he really was because Fenway beefed up his stats.
That was a sarcastic fist pump. I hate Jeter more than I hate cancer.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred
Absolutely. I'm sure that the 28 guys who didn't vote for Rickey chalk it up to stupid shit like "I don't vote for first ballot guys" or "he was a jerk" or "baseball players today aren't like they were 50 years ago" or "I don't vote for leadoff hitters".Quote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Whatever. He was an amazing all-around player who was great to watch.
nope, even though I guess he's technically played the game the way it's supposed to be played.Quote:
Originally Posted by bode
It's crazy that 1-5 writers will take it upon themselves to not vote a certain person in on their first ballot for no fucking reason at all. I'm not sure if the voting is public, I'm pretty sure it isn't, but it needs to become public if it isn't and the writers/voters have to explain their decisions.
Hell Babe Ruth wasn't a unanimous decision, nor was Hank Aaron or Willie Mays or Roberto Clemente or Koufax or Williams or Ryan ETC....
bah
Rice doesn't really belong, there are a ton of hitters of his ilk who never got a sniff of the HOF. On the other hand, there have been some really weak candidates getting in lately...the voters have become an odd bunch, quickly dismissing some guys who deserved serious consideration (Will Clark, Dwight Evans -- compare him to Rice, different players but similar value, Lou Whitaker), while putting in guys like Tony Perez and Jim Rice.
Also, Raines absolutely deserves to be in. He was 99.9% the player Rickey was in his prime, and arguably the 2nd or 3rd best player in the NL during the 1980s.
i think i got tricked...
http://downlode.org/Creative/Writing...s/itsatrap.jpg
omg admiral ackbar
I assume most posting in this thread are into sabermetrics and know about bbref.com...poker and sabermetrics are sorta the same thing.
edit: oops didn't see Benny posted Rice's home-road stats.
Fenway's much more neutral now; we forget what a hitter's haven it was 30 years ago. These splits are practically Coors-like.
Baudib, judging from your Ackbar comment and bbref, maybe you've spent some time at BTF?
yes, I've also written for Hardball Times.
english only please
Rickey Henderson is one of my two all time fav ball players. Tony Fernandez is the other. Rickey was an incredible player imo.
I cant wait to hear his speach..lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3q1kcftSGug
LOL Rome on Rickey in the HOF.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WFW8uO8Jcw
Are you a Jays fan? I loved those 80s-90s Jays teams. I hope Alomar gets in.
Ya when i was a kid i was a huge Jays and baseball fan. Sadly i lost interest over the years, but ya those 80s and 90s Jays teams were great. It was a great moment for me when Rickey joined the Jays.Quote:
Originally Posted by baudib
God im laughing so hard at that Rome clip that i can barely type this.
I went to Tony's last game. I cried like a baby.Quote:
Originally Posted by wesrman
Tying the two things together, here's an article that states Tony Fernandez and Jim Rice's careers had about the same value to them, all things considered. Win Shares takes into account stuff like hitter's parks or pitcher's park and discounts appropriately so it's also an expansion on what I was talking about above.
http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/601606.html
Sophisticated baseball stats....mmmmmm.
The spitter?Quote:
Originally Posted by baudib
First off.. congrats to Rickey Henderson and those who didn't vote for him, wtf? This is the greatest leadoff hitter of all time.. he changed the game when he was on base.. Tim Raines will eventually, I hope he does..
Jim Rice... I was on most everyone elses side saying that I felt he was deserved and thought he should be in... Then Benny was asked to make a case AGAINST Jim Rice and I think he did just that... everything in this paragraph i agree with:
"Carl Yastrzemski was similarly beefed up by Fenway. I've got no problem with Yaz's election though, since he had huge career numbers. Discount his 3400 hits and 1850 RBI and he's still got huge numbers. Discount Rice similarly though, and his 2400 hits and 1450 RBI look pretty meh. Andre Dawson had 2774 and 1591 and he's even struggling to get in. Dave Parker had 2712 and 1492. Harold baines put up 2866 and 1628. Rusty Staub even had more hits and RBI than Rice in his career. None of those three even sniffed the HOF.
Long story short, dude looks a lot better than he really was because Fenway beefed up his stats."
I know Jim Rice was a feared hitter, but these are some other good names here and they should be in before Jim Rice.
Rice's problem is he was really done as a great player after age 26, and was finished early. If he could have maintained that 77-79 level a few more years, he'd be right up there. He was still a great RBI guy cuz he had Boggs/Evans in front of him, but with his low OBP and humongous DPs he was making a shitton of outs -- 515 (!) in 1984.
hopefully Andre Dawson gets in
always loved watching him for some reason
Hawk's OBP is even worse than Rice's, but I think he's a better candidate. He was legitimately great as a center fielder for a few years and a great baserunner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
albert pujols.
manny?
no, manny has to many manny-isms.
pujols is straight up piss-your-pants-pitcher scary. and can field properly.
and multiple positions too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
Parting thought: The Hall of Fame needs to be defined just as much by who isn't in it as who is. Jim Rice needs to be another Andre Dawson, elevating the level of play required to make it in to the HOF.