Questioning the types of hands being posted lately..
I'm questioning a lot of the SHNL hands lately in general. I think people are really focusing on all the wrong hands. Before you post a hand ask yourself "is this mega standard? is anyone on FTR ever folding this?"... if the answer is "no".. then its probably not a good hand to post.
There are a lot more interesting spots than just "I need to stack off here right?" type spots. Think about all the spots you might be losing thin value by not betting. Think about all the spots you might be value towning yourself by betting instead of c/f'ing. All the spots where a c/r might be better than just betting out, or an overbet bluff might be way more effective than just betting pot.
I think it miiight have been from elements of poker (though I'm not sure), that said that hands like AA or 27o aren't the hands that determine the big winners/losers. That's because mostly everyone will fold 27o, and mostly everyone will play/get it in with AA in a similar fashion.
But instead that the biggest difference between winners/losers comes down to the in-between hands. Comes down to how well they play 57ss, or QTo or anything else in between. Because those are the hands with the biggest variability in how they are played, and so those are inherently the most 'interesting' hands.
Yes it sucks that your set lost to a turned straight. Yes it sucks that your overpair lost to a flopped two pair/set. It sucks that your KK ran into AA. and that your 8 high flush lost to a nut flush. Yes these stack-offs suck. But if these are the hands you're looking to for improvement, then you're looking in the wrong places.