Some hands from last night - 50nl

Printable View

01-30-2011, 12:12 PM
grnydrowave2

Some hands from last night - 50nl Rush

Sorry if any of these are yawn;standard. I'm still reeling from a bad session and having trouble analyzing these 100% objectively.

$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
FullTiltPoker
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Villain is 10/5 over 162 hands. In that time he has never 3-bet ever, so QQ+ is presumably in his range. AF is 3.0, AggFreq is 41%.

Stacks:
UTG ($60.35)
UTG+1 ($39.25)
MP1 ($66.60)
Hero ($50.25)
MP3 ($22.40)
CO ($51.85)
BTN ($56.50)
SB ($66.75)
BB ($153.95)

Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 9 players) Hero is MP2 :kd: :kc:
3 folds, Hero raises to $2, 2 folds, BTN calls $2, 1 fold, BB calls $1.50

Flop: :8d: :7s: :4h: ($6.25, 3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $4, BTN folds, BB calls $4

Turn: :5d: ($14.25, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $8.50, BB raises to $32.50

---------------------------------------------------------------------

$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
FullTiltPoker
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

All I know about MP1 is that he has only VPIP'd 1 time in the last 28 hands.

Stacks:
Hero ($51.50)
UTG+1 ($54.55)
MP1 ($52.75)
MP2 ($53.05)
MP3 ($72.30)
CO ($95.70)
BTN ($20)
SB ($22.70)
BB ($30.30)

Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 9 players) Hero is UTG :ad: :qd:
Hero raises to $1.50, UTG+1 calls $1.50, MP1 calls $1.50, 6 folds

Flop: :5d: :6d: :3c: ($5.25, 3 players)
Hero bets $3, UTG+1 calls $3, MP1 raises to $14, Hero goes all-in $50 ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------

$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
FullTiltPoker
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Villain is 13/8 over 52 hands. 5% 3-bet. Inf. AF, 67% agg freq.

Stacks:
UTG ($87.30)
Hero ($67.80)
MP1 ($39.50)
MP2 ($29.05)
MP3 ($49.95)
CO ($133.25)
BTN ($71.30)
SB ($50)
BB ($50)

Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 9 players) Hero is UTG+1 :ad: :as:
1 fold, Hero raises to $2, 2 folds, MP3 calls $2, 4 folds

Flop: :td: :9s: :4h: ($4.75, 2 players)
Hero bets $3, MP3 raises to $7, Hero calls $4

Turn: :qc: ($18.75, 2 players)
Hero checks, MP3 bets $11, Hero calls $11

River: :3s: ($40.75, 2 players)
Hero checks, MP3 goes all-in $29.95

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
FullTiltPoker
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Villain is 8/4 over 50 hands and has never 3-bet.

Stacks:
UTG ($108)
UTG+1 ($54.60)
MP1 ($82.60)
Hero ($54.15)
MP3 ($25.15)
CO ($59.50)
BTN ($30.50)
SB ($19.55)
BB ($47.70)

Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 9 players) Hero is MP2 :ac: :as:
3 folds, Hero raises to $2, 1 fold, CO calls $2, 3 folds

Flop: :5s: :9h: :2h: ($4.75, 2 players)
Hero bets $3, CO calls $3

Turn: :ts: ($10.75, 2 players)
Hero bets $6, CO raises to $16, Hero calls $10

River: :9c: ($42.75, 2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $18
01-30-2011, 03:25 PM
daven

who are you on ftp?

KK - who is villain? what is their fold to c-bet %. Fold turn, 10-5 types don't float as much as you think, nor do they often shove JJ here. You rep the nuts and he's eager to play for stacks.

AdQd - flop fold, not even close vs an ubernit. Especially if he's eastern european.

AdAs. Close. Bet-fold turn if you're planning to check-call. As played don't call turn if you aren't planning to call river.

AsAc. Gross. Turn is interesting. River call as played.
01-30-2011, 04:13 PM
grnydrowave2

Quote:

Originally Posted by daven

who are you on ftp?

My name on FTP is grnydrowave. All these hands were played on Rush tables.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daven

KK - who is villain? what is their fold to c-bet %. Fold turn, 10-5 types don't float as much as you think, nor do they often shove JJ here. You rep the nuts and he's eager to play for stacks.

Villain's name is "when u know". His fold to c-bet is 50%, which might seem very floaty, but this is only over a sample of 2 hands.

How do we feel about the 2nd barrel? I think there might be some value in this, as a lot of his c/c range is overpairs that we beat.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daven

AdQd - flop fold, not even close vs an ubernit. Especially if he's eastern european.

For some reason I was thinking that if his range is 99+, sets, and the occassional KdJd, then I have something in the neighborhood of 45% equity so shoving is +EV if he just folds a small percentage of the time. But you're right, his range is probably way more narrow than that. This hand is kind of embarrassing now that I look at it with fresh eyes, lol.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daven

AdAs. Close. Bet-fold turn if you're planning to check-call. As played don't call turn if you aren't planning to call river.

c/c and then folding the next street is probably a big leak of mine. It's something I've been trying to work on. When contemplating a c/c I should be asking myself how I feel about calling another bet the next street.

That said, isn't the principle behind b/f that most villains are calling more hands than they're betting with? In this case villain seems very aggro, so I think c/c might be the better line against him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daven

AsAc. Gross. Turn is interesting. River call as played.

Ehhh. Turn is tough. I kind of feel like it's close to 50/50. By that I mean he's doing that with stuff like overpairs half the time and I have him smoked, but just as often he has sets. River is a pretty easy call given the odds, imo. But I think it's weird that he bets that size. Effective stacks are about $34 I think. Are we still calling a shove? I tend to think yes, but that's based entirely on my assessment of his range on the turn, which may be flawed.

Thanks for the input, Daven.
01-30-2011, 04:18 PM
daven

Quote:

Originally Posted by grnydrowave2

My name on FTP is grnydrowave. All these hands were played on Rush tables.

Need to state in op that these hands are rush. Rush is a different game altogether and the relative importance of different reads changes a whole bunch. Talk to you about it on irc if you want.
02-03-2011, 11:48 AM
cardsman1992

Hand 1 and Hand 2 look like folds to me.

Anyone like a flop shove in hand 3?

Hand 4--Turn raises=nuts more often than not.
02-03-2011, 12:29 PM
grnydrowave2

I always appreciate feedback, but it's much more helpful if you explain why would make a certain choice.
02-03-2011, 01:23 PM
cardsman1992

Okay--

Hand 1--villain appears to be a bit of a nit. He calls your raise oop, check calls the flop (if he didn't have a piece of it, or an overpair then he probably folds), then check bombs a scare card on the turn. His range? Sets or combo draws on the flop. Draw comes in on the turn, but he also picks up another diamond. He's probably not doing this with QQ-TT, and if he's doing it with AA (again not likely due to PF action) then you're still beat. Most likely hands, in order--66/56/88/77/44/46/86/oddball combo SF draw/AA.

Hand 2--villain calls for the first time in 28 hands, with another caller sandwiched. Can't totally discount high pairs I guess. Range is weighted to smaller pairs, sooted connectors, connected cards. Flop comes low, he sees your cbet, and a call, and still raises you. Most of his range connected with that flop, and you are flipping with the part of his range that didn't hit.

Hand 4 I already gave reasoning, but it certainly looks like he hit his set on the flop. However, I'm not good at folding AA either, especially getting better than 3:1 on the river. I call as played but expect to lose fairly often.