Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

1.45 mill graph from 2+2

Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1

    Default 1.45 mill graph from 2+2

    [/img]
  2. #2
    lol. is this fgators?

    What a sad, sad graph.
  3. #3
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    yeah, thats fgators
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  4. #4
    is that graph mathematically possible?
    ndultimate.
  5. #5
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by PapalRage
    is that graph mathematically possible?
    thats what happens when you fold to resistance every time you dont have the nuts.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  6. #6
    God he runs so bad
  7. #7
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    lukie theorem
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    God he runs so bad
    Ya man.
    Just think what will happen in the long run for him, after he gets past this little bad run of cards.


    "Call it a sixth sense, seeing or reading into his soul, what have you, it's just a God given gift"

    -Fgators
  9. #9
    Wow, is this for real?

    I don't even wanna think about possibly having a 1.4mill hand break even stretch. 70k break even stretch is driving me crazy as it is!

    That's pretty gross.
  10. #10
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24
    Wow, is this for real?

    I don't even wanna think about possibly having a 1.4mill hand break even stretch. 70k break even stretch is driving me crazy as it is!

    That's pretty gross.
    it looks more like a 30k downswing over 1 million hands
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  11. #11
    That's pretty gross.[/quote]
    it looks more like a 30k downswing over 1 million hands[/quote]

    but think about all the fpps!
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    God he runs so bad
    or does he just play so bad?
  13. #13
    mixchange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,863
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Quote Originally Posted by eugmac
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    God he runs so bad
    or does he just play so bad?
    I think we all agree on that. If you follow 2+2 at all, his results have been a running joke for awhile.
  14. #14
    I still don't even see how this graph can be possible... thats so sick if its legitimate and he's actually $550k under expectation.

    god... seeing graphs like this make me completely rethink the idea of ever playing full time!
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24
    I still don't even see how this graph can be possible... thats so sick if its legitimate and he's actually $550k under expectation.

    god... seeing graphs like this make me completely rethink the idea of ever playing full time!
    Only thing that graf shows is that he sucks ass at pots that don't go to showdown. He is weak tight and folds too much to aggression.
  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    266
    Location
    Lincoln, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24
    I still don't even see how this graph can be possible... thats so sick if its legitimate and he's actually $550k under expectation.

    god... seeing graphs like this make me completely rethink the idea of ever playing full time!
    Um, the difference between the red and blue lines is what he's losing in expectation.

    The difference between the red/blue lines and the green line is what he's lost in non showdown pots.

    He's down not very much in expectation, and down a massive amount in non showdown pots - thats where he's lost all his money.
  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
    Only thing that graf shows is that he sucks ass at pots that don't go to showdown. He is weak tight and folds too much to aggression.
    Quote Originally Posted by Taxi

    Um, the difference between the red and blue lines is what he's losing in expectation.

    The difference between the red/blue lines and the green line is what he's lost in non showdown pots.

    He's down not very much in expectation, and down a massive amount in non showdown pots - thats where he's lost all his money.
    I seee.. alright that makes more sense, thanks!

    Maybe if my damn site was compatible with pokerev I'd understand these graphs better

    ok.. back to dreaming about a future playing poker....
  18. #18
    Yea I wasn't jopking about him running bad. He has a word document FULL of bad beats.
  19. #19
    Chopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,611
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Yea I wasn't jopking about him running bad. He has a word document FULL of bad beats.
    he has 1.5 million hands. shouldnt he have a couple of word docs full of bad beat stories? shouldnt we all?

    i think there is a lot of credibility to the fact he runs weak/tight. hell, my graph is starting to look the same, and it scares the shit out of me. my question is:

    how do we FIX it? i feel i use FE. i feel i semi-bluff. i feel i can put people on a range...ok-ish. i dont like it when my cbets get raised. i dont like being called down when i cant bet 3 streets w/ TPGK. however, is the solution to GET to showdown more often by playing pot control? or, to trust your cards a bit more, since we are tighter by nature?

    we cant just turn into calling stations to get to showdowns. any ideas?
    LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.

    Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Chopper
    is the solution to GET to showdown more often by playing pot control? or, to trust your cards a bit more, since we are tighter by nature?
    A good player will easy identify you using pot control and use it against you to your advantage, bluffing you out of the pot for example
  21. #21
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by ZwiFT
    Quote Originally Posted by Chopper
    is the solution to GET to showdown more often by playing pot control? or, to trust your cards a bit more, since we are tighter by nature?
    A good player will easy identify you using pot control and use it against you to your advantage, bluffing you out of the pot for example
    lol, which is the problem to begin with.

    vicious cycle.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by ZwiFT
    Quote Originally Posted by Chopper
    is the solution to GET to showdown more often by playing pot control? or, to trust your cards a bit more, since we are tighter by nature?
    A good player will easy identify you using pot control and use it against you to your advantage, bluffing you out of the pot for example
    *Sorry i meant to his advantage
  23. #23
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    My god, it's broomcorn's uncle!
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    150
    Location
    not playing much
    I saw fgators at my 100nl table the other day and i couldn't believe it. He's like an online legend.

    I like pokerev it gives crappy players an excuse for their play and good players another way to look at their results.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •