|
2 Hands facing river aggression - 200NL
1st hand is a completeeeee fish. 67/2/1.5 over about 100 hands. I know he would call with a lot worse but don't see what his raising with here. Should I have C/C the river? Any other street you would play it different? Do I call or fold now?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (6 handed) -
CO ($650.70)
Button ($294.75)
SB ($198)
BB ($200)
UTG ($210.05)
Hero (MP) ($436.15)
Preflop: Hero is MP with , 
1 fold, Hero raises to $8, 1 fold, Button calls $8, 2 folds
Flop: ($19) , , (2 players)
Hero bets $14, Button calls $14
Turn: ($47) (2 players)
Hero bets $40, Button calls $40
River: ($127) (2 players)
Hero bets $60, Button raises to $120
This hand, at the time villain was 14/12/2.3 3B:3% or something like that over only 100 hands or so. All those stats don't mean much considering this was a limped pot but basically I am thinking his not a spewtard or something and not that bad and maybe on the tigheter side a bit. He almost never has 99/88 here. The third guy is a complete fish and would get it in here with so many different kinda garbage. What should I put villain on river?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (5 handed) -
Hero (SB) ($247.05)
BB ($392.35)
UTG ($91)
MP ($213.40)
Button ($101.30)
Preflop: Hero is SB with , 
UTG calls $2, 1 fold, Button calls $2, Hero calls $1, BB checks
Flop: ($8) , , (4 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $5, UTG calls $5, 1 fold, Hero calls $5
Turn: ($23) (3 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $17, UTG calls $17, Hero raises to $37, BB calls $20, UTG calls $20
River: ($134) (3 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $110, UTG calls $47 (All-In)
|