|  | 
			
			
			
			
				 2 Hands facing river aggression - 200NL
				
					
						1st hand is a completeeeee fish. 67/2/1.5 over about 100 hands. I know he would call with a lot worse but don't see what his raising with here. Should I have C/C the river? Any other street you would play it different? Do I call or fold now?
 PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (6 handed) -
 
 CO ($650.70)
 Button ($294.75)
 SB ($198)
 BB ($200)
 UTG ($210.05)
 Hero (MP) ($436.15)
 
 Preflop: Hero is MP with
  ,  1 fold, Hero raises to $8, 1 fold, Button calls $8, 2 folds
 
 Flop: ($19)
  ,  ,  (2 players) Hero bets $14, Button calls $14
 
 Turn: ($47)
  (2 players) Hero bets $40, Button calls $40
 
 River: ($127)
  (2 players) Hero bets $60, Button raises to $120
 
 
 This hand, at the time villain was 14/12/2.3  3B:3% or something like that over only 100 hands or so. All those stats don't mean much considering this was a limped pot but basically I am thinking his not a spewtard or something and not that bad and maybe on the tigheter side a bit. He almost never has 99/88 here. The third guy is a complete fish and would get it in here with so many different kinda garbage. What should I put villain on river?
 
 PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (5 handed) -
 
 Hero (SB) ($247.05)
 BB ($392.35)
 UTG ($91)
 MP ($213.40)
 Button ($101.30)
 
 Preflop: Hero is SB with
  ,  UTG calls $2, 1 fold, Button calls $2, Hero calls $1, BB checks
 
 Flop: ($8)
  ,  ,  (4 players) Hero checks, BB bets $5, UTG calls $5, 1 fold, Hero calls $5
 
 Turn: ($23)
  (3 players) Hero checks, BB bets $17, UTG calls $17, Hero raises to $37, BB calls $20, UTG calls $20
 
 River: ($134)
  (3 players) Hero checks, BB bets $110, UTG calls $47 (All-In)
 |