Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

200NL: Kang and Kang, std 3bet spot

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Default 200NL: Kang and Kang, std 3bet spot

    $1/$2 No Limit Holdem
    5 Players
    Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG Snajpor ($307.90)
    CO work2do ($268.60)
    BTN kes1981 ($288.40)
    SB iLeftFTP ($206.55)
    BB Hero ($200)

    Pre-Flop: ($3, 5 players) Hero is BB
    Snajpor raises to $6, 1 fold, kes1981 calls $6, 1 fold, Hero raises to $24, Snajpor folds, kes1981 calls $18

    Flop: ($55, 2 players)
    Hero bets $34, kes1981 calls $34

    Turn: ($123, 2 players)
    Hero bets $44, kes1981 goes all-in $230.40, Hero goes all-in $98

    River: ($495.40, 2 players, 2 all-in)

    Villain is a reg who runs 24/20/6% 3b, 70% fold to 3b. No relevant
    history.

    I mostly wanna talk about bet sizing here. After the hand I kinda felt like I should have just bet the flop bigger to shove the turn, but I suppose spreading it out over 3 streets has some merits as well. thoughts?
  2. #2
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    either bet slightly bigger or slightly smaller on the flop for sure. I like $26 or so and think villain will call with a wider range since he knows hes not getting shoved on on the turn.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  3. #3
    I think making it a little bigger on the flop and shove turn is a little better and way easier to balance/harder to read.
  4. #4
    Yah I probably go $36 flop, jam turn.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •