3/6- confusion vs technologic

my image is slightly tighter than at 5/10 id imagine
tho its still complete dogshit

POKERSTARS GAME #12746972790: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2007/10/20 - 19:38:56 (ET)
Table 'Shajna II' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Sauce123 ($1128.75 in chips)
Seat 2: technologic ($1412.75 in chips)
Seat 4: duyle ($260.60 in chips)
Seat 5: kondos 1 ($154 in chips)
Seat 6: krooptroop ($229.55 in chips)
D.R.JORA will be allowed to play after the button
duyle: posts small blind $3
kondos 1: posts big blind $6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Sauce123 [Ac Kc]
krooptroop: folds
Sauce123: raises $15 to $21
technologic: calls $21
duyle: folds
kondos 1: folds
*** FLOP *** [7s 8d Ah]
Sauce123: bets $39
technologic: calls $39
*** TURN *** [7s 8d Ah] [As]
Sauce123: checks
technologic: bets $90
Sauce123: raises $204 to $294
technologic: raises $1058.75 to $1352.75 and is all-in
Sauce123 said, "ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww"
Sauce123 said, "god"
Sauce123 said, "i think i have to stack off here techno"

I just don't get how logically technologic doesn't raise this flop with his nut hands here. His stack is never getting in if he doesn't raise the flop unless you take this exact line which i kinda doubt.

Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan

I just don't get how logically technologic doesn't raise this flop with his nut hands here. His stack is never getting in if he doesn't raise the flop unless you take this exact line which i kinda doubt.

its not always about getting your stack in

I don't think he's ever doing this for value with worse.

He's probably just fucking around. He's a millionairem wtf does he care!

If he plays tight as well, its highly likely he has 77 or 88. Dont think hed risk that much if he knew u were tight as well. However, if he is more aggressive, then he may just believe you don't have that ace because he has one. I really cant put him on a7 or a8 though, so id call.

Originally Posted by Irisheyes

He's probably just fucking around. He's a millionairem wtf does he care!

millionaire?


He would have to be bluffing or shoving a funky turned combo draw about 1/3rd of the time to make calling profitable. Given the action, it looks like both of you could concievably have full houses so i'd say he is bluffing with the stack sizes as they are even less often. Or do good 600NL regs level each other like crazy?

Originally Posted by Vi-Zer0Skill

Originally Posted by Irisheyes

He's probably just fucking around. He's a millionairem wtf does he care!

millionaire?

he won some wpt thing i think

Originally Posted by EzDuzIt

Originally Posted by Vi-Zer0Skill

Originally Posted by Irisheyes

He's probably just fucking around. He's a millionairem wtf does he care!

millionaire?

he won some wpt thing i think

tourney donk? :P

Originally Posted by EzDuzIt

Originally Posted by Vi-Zer0Skill

Originally Posted by Irisheyes

He's probably just fucking around. He's a millionairem wtf does he care!

millionaire?

he won some wpt thing i think

Seventh place at the 2006 WSOP main event ($2,391,520)

Doug Kim! Nice

technologic is Doug Kim?

When in doubt, Google it

man i don't get why he's 3betting the c/r. i mean, why not let u keep on spewing?
and there are a bunch of hands he's playing like this until you c/r (or is he a nit?)...not sure how crazy he is though, since bluffing Ax/OESD/etc is really crazy, even though i've done that when im in very spewy moods, except just for 1 BI.

...results??

9sTs ftw

omg it s the wsop guy call call call call

Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer

Doug Kim! Nice

Ya

Yah i agree with benny that most people (u guys know more about said villain) flat call this turn with a boat and let you spew the river. So i think it's ok to stack off as well. thumbs up

i think your ahead, he is probabbly smooth calling you with a hand that beats you.

wader i probably fold AA/KK/AQ in the hand we played today btw.

he is a supppppppppppppppppppppppppper nit, i got 5 on it that he has 77 or 88