3/6 NL HU $1200 stacks

I decided to make a standard raise to $18 and the BB reraises to $54. We both are consistently making c-bets after raising/reraising. I call with JhJs. BB makes c-bet of $75 on a flop of: QdJc7s. I reraise to $200 and he flat calls. The BB checks a turn of: 7d. I bet $200 on the turn and he flat calls. The river is: 5h. He checks the river and you bet $300 and he ends up instantly pushing over the top of your bet. What is he most likely holding'?

A. KK
B. QQ
C. 77
D. 55

B or D

This is kind of a rediculous question but A and D are retarded for any villain. QQ and 77 are equally likely ijn a sense, but since quads is statistically less likely than a set lets go for B.

Btw this post sucks, I'm really really bored.

A is not "retarded" at all

C and D seem a bit out there for a few reasons, one being his 3betting range PF the other being I don't see him flatting the flop with bottom set or 55

A is not "retarded" at all

I don't see how he can possibly show up with KK here. The rest of the line makes total sesne for KK, but why is he ever going to value shove this river after we've shwon so much strength right through this hand, never slowing down on any street? Also I'm guessing he isn't turning it into a bluff since it doesn't look as though we're folding much.

Maybe I'm totally not comprehending the aggression of 600NL and there is still some value on this river for KK idk just seems like his hand would become a bluff catcher the way it has been played.

Originally Posted by Carroters

A is not "retarded" at all

I don't see how he can possibly show up with KK here. The rest of the line makes total sesne for KK, but why is he ever going to value shove this river after we've shwon so much strength right through this hand, never slowing down on any street? Also I'm guessing he isn't turning it into a bluff since it doesn't look as though we're folding much.

Maybe I'm totally not comprehending the aggression of 600NL and there is still some value on this river for KK idk just seems like his hand would become a bluff catcher the way it has been played.

No, it's heads up
top pair is the nuts heads up
he expects AQ to play for stacks and QJ to play for stacks

Here's an NL50 hand:
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (2 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Button ($48.60)
Hero (SB) ($68.30)

Preflop: Hero is SB with K, 9
Button raises to $1.50, Hero raises to $5.25, Button calls $3.75

Flop: ($10.50) 5, 2, 9 (2 players)
Hero bets $7, Button raises to $16, Hero calls $9

Turn: ($42.50) 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $27.35 (All-In), Hero calls $27.35

River: ($97.20) Q (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $97.20 | Rake: $0.50

Results in white below:
Button had 10, J (one pair, fives).
Hero had K, 9 (two pair, nines and fives).
Outcome: Hero won $96.70

It could be KK or AA maybe if you aren't sure if he's retarded or not. Then after that quads. But i'm not folding unless you know 100% for a fact he never ever 3-bets A7 or Q7 or J7 or 75 as a bluff.

Oh and don't c-bet everytime you raise probably