Quote Originally Posted by langaan
A - I don't think we slow him down when he has top pair
no, but he'll slow down his bluffs. and im not saying this is the best option, but i have used it when i think I am ahead of a maniac capable of complete bluffs on all streets.

B - What F/E do we have? We have showdown value anyways
there are maniacs out there who fold to agression almsot always. again, id only do this based on reads

C - Explain how "info" is good because to me, "info" means betting when we called by better and when we fold out worse.
its simple really, against this guy, if he doesnt shove he doesnt have an OP or a 10


This guy has a huge range on this board, I just call down.
you want to call down all streets with mid pair crap kicker instead of making a play early?
A. Yeah, if we stay at his table long enough he may slow down his bluffs but I don't think I'd choose this hand to do it with.

B. What part of his range that we beat does he fold? No question he has a high folding % but what kind of fold equity do we have?

C. I still don't like that way of thinking at all, our equity is better when he has a wide range that includes a bunch of bluffs than when we reraise and he only continues with a piece. So yeah I want to call down when I think we have the most equity.

D. I'm stubborn