Quote Originally Posted by dsaxton
I posted the link to point out that the fact that a gamble has positive expectation is not sufficient in showing that it is a "good" gamble. If it were, then it would be a good gamble to pay $3 million to play the St. Petersburg game, where you only win $2 half the time.
how is this in any way relevant when lukie is playing with a 100+ buyin bankroll?