Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

Easy preflop stuff

Results 1 to 31 of 31
  1. #1

    Default Easy preflop stuff

    I just switched over from FR so I'm wondering what you guys think of these things. I'm 20/14. Is alot of this stuff more read dependant than I'm giving it credit, or is it standard?


    Hand 1) Is this a always a standard blind steal spot?


    ***** Hand History for Game 4479665602 *****
    $400 NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, June 09, 23:22:13 ET 2006
    Table Table 106324 (No DP) (Real Money)
    Seat 1 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 4: pauly0033 ( $498.21 )
    Seat 6: lolYouFoldEZ ( $830.90 )
    Seat 3: Triumph15 ( $400 )
    Seat 5: punknanaudi ( $561.60 )
    Seat 1: mscotto ( $414.35 )
    Seat 2: spennymac198 ( $349.97 )
    spennymac198 posts small blind [$2].
    Triumph15 posts big blind [$4].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to lolYouFoldEZ [ 3d Ac ]
    >You have options at Table 109754 Table!.
    pauly0033 folds.
    punknanaudi folds.
    lolYouFoldEZ raises [$15].



    Hand 2)
    Raise highish SC's here?

    ***** Hand History for Game 4479467265 *****
    $400 NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, June 09, 22:55:17 ET 2006
    Table Table 109754 (Real Money)
    Seat 6 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 2: DonkFish77 ( $1905.87 )
    Seat 3: ddg4u2nv ( $532.18 )
    Seat 5: robp09 ( $445.71 )
    Seat 4: lolYouFoldEZ ( $388.70 )
    Seat 1: Rajesh2345 ( $275.10 )
    Seat 6: bjp17 ( $409.74 )
    Rajesh2345 posts small blind [$2].
    DonkFish77 posts big blind [$4].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to lolYouFoldEZ [ 7h 6h ]
    ddg4u2nv folds.
    lolYouFoldEZ raises [$15].


    Hand 3) Good idea/Bad Idea?

    ***** Hand History for Game 4475271170 *****
    $200 NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, June 09, 12:22:41 ET 2006
    Table Table 109584 (No DP) (Real Money)
    Seat 1 is the button
    Total number of players : 5
    Seat 1: billyjoe76 ( $386.65 )
    Seat 2: lolYouFoldEZ ( $385.45 )
    Seat 4: HOFFA_FAN_55 ( $206.45 )
    Seat 6: KenFord777 ( $84.72 )
    Seat 3: RErbBK ( $207.10 )
    lolYouFoldEZ posts small blind [$1].
    RErbBK posts big blind [$2].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to lolYouFoldEZ [ 6s 6d ]
    HOFFA_FAN_55 folds.
    KenFord777 calls [$2].
    billyjoe76 calls [$2].
    >You have options at Table 107905 Table!.
    lolYouFoldEZ raises [$10].


    Hand 4) Standard fold? What about the same hand in UTG+1 with a fold in front of you?

    ***** Hand History for Game 4475461699 *****
    $200 NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, June 09, 13:13:13 ET 2006
    Table Table 107452 (Real Money)
    Seat 4 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 1: cardiac777 ( $180.50 )
    Seat 2: lolYouFoldEZ ( $257.20 )
    Seat 5: Hobbes88111 ( $299.03 )
    Seat 6: I_SHIIT_ON_U ( $346.42 )
    Seat 3: MilesAhead ( $184 )
    Seat 4: tonis_boy ( $193 )
    Hobbes88111 posts small blind [$1].
    I_SHIIT_ON_U posts big blind [$2].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to lolYouFoldEZ [ Js Kd ]
    lolYouFoldEZ folds.


    Hand 5) Whats your range for calling OOP like this? This +EV?


    ***** Hand History for Game 4476013938 *****
    $200 NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, June 09, 15:13:48 ET 2006
    Table Table 107386 (Real Money)
    Seat 2 is the button
    Total number of players : 5
    Seat 3: lolYouFoldEZ ( $298.08 )
    Seat 6: bigz79 ( $304.44 )
    Seat 2: KPTNKIRK ( $163.65 )
    Seat 4: bobertos ( $76.55 )
    Seat 1: jsalt88 ( $200 )
    lolYouFoldEZ posts small blind [$1].
    >You have options at Table 107470 Table!.
    bobertos posts big blind [$2].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to lolYouFoldEZ [ Qh Kd ]
    bigz79 folds.
    creier has joined the table.
    KPTNKIRK raises [$9].
    lolYouFoldEZ calls [$8].
  2. #2
    looks pretty standard to me

    I may not raise that A3o, and I may not call with KQo all the time....but both plays are okay.


  3. #3
    Robert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,121
    Location
    Kokkedal, Denmark
    Hand 1: Raising acetrash from the CO is generally bad imo without a read on the btn and the blinds.

    Hand 2: Yes its fine. If the table is v ery aggressive and tough I might fold this prf because I'm OOP.

    hand 3: Without a read on the limpers = very bad. You are OOP with a marginal. To do this you want a read on the limpers that says that they will fold to raises after limping. I never do this, I think its generally -EV.

    Hand 4: I raise KJ any position. On a very aggressive and tough table this might be a fold UTG and UTG+1, but then again you should switch tables if thats the case.

    Hand 5: This depends on the btn raiser. Normally I dump this because I'm OOP with a hand thats easily dominated. But against an habitual raiser in position I might find a call or even reraise.
  4. #4
    I think this is mostly read dependant.. ie how you feel the table plays. From these plays it looks like the tables give you respect and noone has taken a liking to playing back at you.

    The hands I don't like are the first and the fourth to be honest. I'll never raise A3o apart from a button that's folded to me (or maybe you hadn't raised in a while?), and I always raise KJ anywhere. It looks a bit weird here.. you raise A3o after two folds, yet fold KJo..
  5. #5
    Rob what are your VP$IP and PFR stats if you don't mind me asking?

    Thanks for the replies by the way.
  6. #6
    Robert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,121
    Location
    Kokkedal, Denmark
    In my first 12k hands of NL100 6-max I was 25/14. I was playing a bit too loose UTG and UTG+1 and I was blind stealing a bit to much from LP against loose players.

    In my new PT database I'm running 23/11. My PFraise might seem a bit low, but I limp behind limpers a lot in LP (I've been adviced on raising limpers in position instead of just limping behind) ; and on loose passive tables (the tables I usually play) I limp SCs and suited aces from UTG and UTG+1 too. Raising these on loose tables is bad imo, because you will often be called behind and be OOP with a marginal drawing hand.

    I will probably increase my PFraise when I move up to higher and more aggressive stakes, because in these games open-limping becomes a leak - but on weak loose passive tables its OK to openlimp from EP.
  7. #7
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    hand5 reraise
    ask you button stealers to poach your blinds with a hand or at least play post-flop
  8. #8
    Robert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,121
    Location
    Kokkedal, Denmark
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    hand5 reraise
    ask you button stealers to poach your blinds with a hand or at least play post-flop
    meh, isnt this bad without any kind of read? Yeah sure, I'll do this with a read, but without one you'll play a marginal hand OOP against a complete unknown - wich is pretty 'meh' imo
  9. #9
    aislephive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,549
    Location
    Downswinging holla!
    1. I don't play weak offsuit aces from any position really.

    2. Sometimes I do sometimes I don't. If the table is pretty tight/passive it's a standard raise, on a more aggressive table I'd probably dump it.

    3. Standard. Build the pot in position and try to win a big pot, or get it HU and take it down with a c-bet.

    4. I usually raise this, but not always. Table dependant for sure.

    5. I used to always just call in these situations, but I've begun reraising LP raisers with a wide range of hands from the blinds and it's worked well. I would probably reraise this guy. You likely have the best hand, and in most cases his hand can't stand a reraise like AT/AJ. And a flop c-bet takes it down a large part of the time. Calling isn't a bad alternative, but folding is IMO. KQ vs a button raise we are rarely dominated and usually have the best hand.
  10. #10
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    meh, isnt this bad without any kind of read? Yeah sure, I'll do this with a read, but without one you'll play a marginal hand OOP against a complete unknown - wich is pretty 'meh' imo
    Reraise one hand oop that probably destroys opps range here and stop him stealing blinds all session long with trash or continue to play hands oop by calling?

    I know what your saying, and i respect it but im of the player who doesnt agree with it. :P
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    Reraise one hand oop that probably destroys opps range here and stop him stealing blinds all session long with trash or continue to play hands oop by calling?
    Why not wait and see if he's actually a stealer before you start counter-measures?
  12. #12
    aislephive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,549
    Location
    Downswinging holla!
    Quote Originally Posted by jackvance
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    Reraise one hand oop that probably destroys opps range here and stop him stealing blinds all session long with trash or continue to play hands oop by calling?
    Why not wait and see if he's actually a stealer before you start counter-measures?
    Even a tight player has a pretty wide range of hands they raise with on the button, from a suited connector to a pocket pair, to any ace to any broadway hand as well as other weak hands. How much of his range can stand a reraise? Very little of it. Even mediocre players know they shouldn't call reraises with AT/AJ and often will fold to a reraise. If not, they'll miss the flop more often than not which means a c-bet is very profitable here.

    It also holds meta-game value as well. If you're only reraising with AK/JJ + then you run the risk of becoming predictable and when you do reraise people can put you a monster every time and subsequently have huge implied odds and have more of a reason to call your reraise. But if you can reraise with a wider range of hands, especially from a LP raiser then you help get action on your big hands and people also lose the implied odds because you won't always have a big hand.

    I would rather reraise a suited connector from the blinds vs a button raiser than just call because a large majority of the time he isn't calling and if he is then we have a hand that can win the pot any number of ways. If it comes AKx then we can fire at it and usually take it down if they don't have a big piece, because what are we representing? AK/AA/KK right? Now if the flop comes and gives us two pair, straight, or a big draw we can play it strongly and our opponent might not give us credit for much because the board likely missed us.

    So yeah, reraising KQ in hand 5 is definitely massive +EV. Just calling OOP and check/folding when we miss is what makes LAG play profitable. There's a big difference between reraising an UTG raiser with KQ and reraising a button raiser with KQ.
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by aislephive
    So yeah, reraising KQ in hand 5 is definitely massive +EV. Just calling OOP and check/folding when we miss is what makes LAG play profitable. There's a big difference between reraising an UTG raiser with KQ and reraising a button raiser with KQ.
    Who said anything about folding if you miss? Depending on the flop, I can lead out, or call a cbet. Without any sort of indication that this guy actually steals, for all we know this guy might just be raising his premiums, so basically you're reraising him with what is probably a dominated hand. So even if you hit the flop, you don't know if you're good and you're sitting on a huge pot, meaning it's quite costy to figure out that, damn, he did raise a premium.

    I really disagree that this is massive +EV without first establishing that his raising range in this spot is indeed very wide.
  14. #14
    aislephive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,549
    Location
    Downswinging holla!
    Quote Originally Posted by jackvance
    Who said anything about folding if you miss? Depending on the flop, I can lead out, or call a cbet. Without any sort of indication that this guy actually steals, for all we know this guy might just be raising his premiums, so basically you're reraising him with what is probably a dominated hand. So even if you hit the flop, you don't know if you're good and you're sitting on a huge pot, meaning it's quite costy to figure out that, damn, he did raise a premium.

    I really disagree that this is massive +EV without first establishing that his raising range in this spot is indeed very wide.
    So if you miss the flop you plan on pulling a check-raise bluff or leading the flop with air into a player you presume is only raising his good hands? That seems really dumb to be honest. And I don't think that just because you don't have a specific read on this guy can you just assume his button raising range includes only big pairs and big aces.
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by jackvance
    Quote Originally Posted by aislephive
    So yeah, reraising KQ in hand 5 is definitely massive +EV. Just calling OOP and check/folding when we miss is what makes LAG play profitable. There's a big difference between reraising an UTG raiser with KQ and reraising a button raiser with KQ.
    Who said anything about folding if you miss? Depending on the flop, I can lead out, or call a cbet. Without any sort of indication that this guy actually steals, for all we know this guy might just be raising his premiums, so basically you're reraising him with what is probably a dominated hand. So even if you hit the flop, you don't know if you're good and you're sitting on a huge pot, meaning it's quite costy to figure out that, damn, he did raise a premium.

    I really disagree that this is massive +EV without first establishing that his raising range in this spot is indeed very wide.
    Yes he may be raising his premiums but in general, especially with the common accelerated understanding of poker strategy button raises are more common and often done with a wider variety of hands. Also reraises are done by many players with a wider variety of hands for roughly the reasons Aislephive listed above.

    And unless you flop the nuts there's not a whole lot of hands which you hit even with premiums that you can take a lot of heat with. Raise AA on the button and see a Q 5 2 flop and get a lot of action... does he have a set or just AQ?

    The point of reraising preflop, which isn't something you should always do with KQ vs a button raisor isn't regarding the strength of your hand. In a lot of ways its setting things up for later situations and has metagame implications. Also it takes the initiative in the hand away from the button and gives you a greater chance to win the pot either postflop or with a bet on any flop.
  16. #16
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Why not wait and see if he's actually a stealer before you start counter-measures?
    This isnt low stakes but ill make a point i (not surprisingly) picked up from fnord and some others early on that vitalised my 6max game.

    'low stakes players call too much when they should be raising'

    Thats why were raising. Ill also add that Irish is a very TAGGY player so his reraise is going to get repect at a 6max table. Aislephive explained the rest well: If you face a reraise from a player, what the heck can you actually call with? (realistically)
    This is a key element a lot of NL players dont take note of imo until they get to high stakes because they dont play enough lhe (ironically)
  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by aislephive
    So if you miss the flop you plan on pulling a check-raise bluff or leading the flop with air into a player you presume is only raising his good hands?
    I didn't say that at all.

    That seems really dumb to be honest. And I don't think that just because you don't have a specific read on this guy can you just assume his button raising range includes only big pairs and big aces.
    On the contrary, I'm not assuming anything. You are however assuming something, namely that it is a position raise. I probably don't have enough high stakes experience, but I've been burned in the past going on this assumption.
    In a lot of ways its setting things up for later situations and has metagame implications.
    Trust me here, my game is all about that. I do my fair share of preflop reraising, with crap even if it seems appropriate (this is rare however). I play the board and the opponent just as much as my own hand. I just find reraising with KQ rather silly. It's slightly weaker than the range you are repping, and dominated by a strong range. You're better off calling here, and reraising him with a real premium, or a different hand like a pp or a sc/sgapper, so that if he calls and you hit, you atleast know you're good.

    low stakes players call too much when they should be raising
    I personally raise 20% of my hands. Any more and it'd be too exploitable.
  18. #18
    I think hands like these can be played multiple ways. It all depends on your personal preference and what you want your image to be at the table. I don't think there's any "right" or "wrong" moves here as long as you play well postflop, preflop you can do w/e you want.
  19. #19
    aislephive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,549
    Location
    Downswinging holla!
    Quote Originally Posted by jackvance
    Quote Originally Posted by aislephive
    So if you miss the flop you plan on pulling a check-raise bluff or leading the flop with air into a player you presume is only raising his good hands?
    I didn't say that at all.
    Basically that's what you said. You said "who said anything about folding if we miss," or maybe I'm just fucking retarded to think that implies that you are going to make a move on the guy?

    That seems really dumb to be honest. And I don't think that just because you don't have a specific read on this guy can you just assume his button raising range includes only big pairs and big aces.
    On the contrary, I'm not assuming anything. You are however assuming something, namely that it is a position raise. I probably don't have enough high stakes experience, but I've been burned in the past going on this assumption.
    I'm assuming that it's a position raise just because it IS most of the time. That doesn't mean that he can't be dealt AA on the button, it just means that his raising standards are very wide, and his range to calling a reraise is thin. Even the tighest of players VASTLY loosen their raising standards on the button.

    In a lot of ways its setting things up for later situations and has metagame implications.
    Trust me here, my game is all about that. I do my fair share of preflop reraising, with crap even if it seems appropriate (this is rare however). I play the board and the opponent just as much as my own hand. I just find reraising with KQ rather silly. It's slightly weaker than the range you are repping, and dominated by a strong range. You're better off calling here, and reraising him with a real premium, or a different hand like a pp or a sc/sgapper, so that if he calls and you hit, you atleast know you're good.
    Is there that much of a difference between AK and KQ? Vs a button raiser KQ is RARELY dominated, simple math tells me this. How is calling preflop and then calling down with TPGK any better? Our actual hand value is both relevant and irrelevant at the same time, KQ has the button raisers hand range crushed, but our hand is irrelevant in many ways because the most likely outcome is that the villain folds PF anyhow, but we still have a solid hand to fall back on. And if you flop top pair in a reraised pot and get called you take your foot off the accelerator, and you can be pretty sure you're beat. But that's a small percentage of the time.
  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by aislephive
    Basically that's what you said. You said "who said anything about folding if we miss," or maybe I'm just fucking retarded to think that implies that you are going to make a move on the guy?
    I said: there's a lot we can do. You said: so you're gonna do THIS (and I didn't even mention a c/r, you made that up?) and it's retarded! I hope you see what I mean..

    I'm assuming that it's a position raise just because it IS most of the time.
    Well, I guess this is the point where we differ in opinions. I prefer to wait a few cycles and see if this guy would do such things.

    Is there that much of a difference between AK and KQ?
    lol..

    Well, you are dominated by more hands and what is worse, you aren't doing any dominating yourself most likely. Btw.. how are you crushing his range? I'd very so much more prefer AJ over KQ here, b/c then I atleast dominate the vast range of Axs hands people could button raise with.

    I raise like 20% of my hands, and looser on the button ofcourse, and a rough estimation is that the only hands you dominate in my range are KJ, KTs, QJs.. you're the worse end of a coinflip vs most of the others. AK would have had me totally crushed however.

    And if you flop top pair in a reraised pot and get called you take your foot off the accelerator, and you can be pretty sure you're beat. But that's a small percentage of the time.
    The pot is already out of control. It's a lot easier to take your foot off the accelerator if you hadn't inflated the pot preflop..

    But yeah, it doesn't get to showing of hands too often in such spots, so in that way your hand is irrelevant.

    But I personally need to get more info before I straight out assume my reraise will scare him.
  21. #21
    Hm, I am however starting to see great merit in this:
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed
    stop him stealing blinds all session long with trash
  22. #22
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    I personally raise 20% of my hands. Any more and it'd be too exploitable.
    The implied threat of reraising (in our example here especially oop) and the implied range of a reraise make reraising and raising much different concepts, especially, i would argue in nitty games like 50nl/100nl/200nl. At 400nl+ i think we ask opponents to play post flop poker more as they will call more i think, but the threat is stll there, particularly from a TAGG player
  23. #23
    The nitty games is where I do well.

    The ones where I currently suck ass are with tables full of floaters. They don't even (re)raise a lot, except maybe on the river.. it's just a lot of check/call action.. when they're decent at flop reads and know when it's probably a bluff etc, it's really hard. I need to do some thinking about that.

    I need to fugure out what lines/situations they exploit, so that I can play my real hands like that. One would be a flop bet, and then check raising the turn. And definately overplay your unsuspected monsters, like sets (too bad I never hit those) or if you hit trips/2p when you're in a raised pot with a non-standard hand. If they have TP they'll probably call you down. I need more, this requires a really different approach than the nitty tables.

    How do you adjust to such floater-heavy tables Miffed?
  24. #24
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    leave

    or perhaps alter my pfr range to keep them thinking.
    Bluff a touch more by 3 betting on overs and leading the turn hard and at times pushing the river on ace high/rag boards.
    Once these type of players figure you'll take hands a little too far they may start rethinking calling you down with a pair/any pair on boards you appear to have missed.
    Also, theyre is an arguement for not raising so much which can put a table on police mode i.e they always call you down. Obviously the counter to this is keep raising and over play more hands for bigger pots if they call you down.
  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    leave
    I can never do that, I just can't back out of a challenge, heh

    Bluff a touch more by 3 betting on overs and leading the turn hard and at times pushing the river on ace high/rag boards.
    Hm, I think you have different opponents in mind than I am talking about? It's very rare that they raise you, so you can't 3bet. They just call a lot. If they actually hit a hand, you'll probably get reraised on the river.

    Once these type of players figure you'll take hands a little too far they may start rethinking calling you down with a pair/any pair on boards you appear to have missed.
    I don't understand this, aren't you exactly playing into their hands? It's very costly to get caught on big bluffs there..

    Also, theyre is an arguement for not raising so much which can put a table on police mode i.e they always call you down. Obviously the counter to this is keep raising and over play more hands for bigger pots if they call you down.
    Yeah, this is what I'm thinking.. but it's still very annoying to be facing this, especially if 2+ people on the table float on every raise. Overplay, go allin a lot, mix in check/raises.. seems to be the way to tackle this. But regardless, it adds a lot more variance to the game then I am used to, heh..
  26. #26
    aislephive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,549
    Location
    Downswinging holla!
    Quote Originally Posted by jackvance
    Quote Originally Posted by aislephive
    Basically that's what you said. You said "who said anything about folding if we miss," or maybe I'm just fucking retarded to think that implies that you are going to make a move on the guy?
    I said: there's a lot we can do. You said: so you're gonna do THIS (and I didn't even mention a c/r, you made that up?) and it's retarded! I hope you see what I mean..
    You said "who said anything about folding if we miss, we can lead or call a c-bet." So that implies that A) You're going to fire with air on the flop, or B) You're going to float OOP and try to take the pot down on a later street.

    I'm assuming that it's a position raise just because it IS most of the time.
    Well, I guess this is the point where we differ in opinions. I prefer to wait a few cycles and see if this guy would do such things.
    It's a general read, most button raisers have light standards. That doesn't mean they never get a real hand and that because I assume they have a weak hand that I can't change my read on later streets.

    Is there that much of a difference between AK and KQ?
    lol..

    Well, you are dominated by more hands and what is worse, you aren't doing any dominating yourself most likely. Btw.. how are you crushing his range? I'd very so much more prefer AJ over KQ here, b/c then I atleast dominate the vast range of Axs hands people could button raise with.
    AJ is if anything slightly better than KQ, but hardly. They are both dominated by pretty much the same hands and both dominate a fair range themselves. KQ may not mathematically crushing the button's range because mathematically all we have is K high which is much weaker (mathematically) than A high. But I would rather be dealt KQo every hand than A2o even though A2 is a solid favorite because KQ flops so much better than A rag.

    You are still getting too caught up in hand values because the general conception is that KQ is a trap hand, that's not the point. KQ is a fine reraising hand because it does flop well, even if you on the rare occasion are dominated and manage to hit the flop but still be outkicked. Even if the button has AK and you reraise him and he calls, the flop is going to miss him most of the time and a c-bet will take it down. But we can still play top pair strongly after the flop KQ, you just have to be careful.

    I raise like 20% of my hands, and looser on the button ofcourse, and a rough estimation is that the only hands you dominate in my range are KJ, KTs, QJs.. you're the worse end of a coinflip vs most of the others. AK would have had me totally crushed however.
    A coinflip is assuming we see all five cards and that the cards just play themselves. I already touched upon it in the last paragraph, but even if we know the button raiser has AK and that we are "dominated, he has 5 outs that he needs to hit on the flop to continue with the hand, the fact that WE have the lead in the hand is very important, much more so than our actual hand, which is a solid hand nonetheless. And a lot of the time he calls with a pocket pair and flopping top pair will get the job done a lot.

    And if you flop top pair in a reraised pot and get called you take your foot off the accelerator, and you can be pretty sure you're beat. But that's a small percentage of the time.
    The pot is already out of control. It's a lot easier to take your foot off the accelerator if you hadn't inflated the pot preflop..[/quote]

    I have no problems fattening up a pot that I'm going to take down a large majority of the time. If you're the type of player who plays top pair like the nuts then maybe you shouldn't be reraising KQ because you might get too attached when you hit when your opponent is telling you that you're beat.

    But yeah, it doesn't get to showing of hands too often in such spots, so in that way your hand is irrelevant.

    But I personally need to get more info before I straight out assume my reraise will scare him.
    A reraise from the blinds is usually a pretty scary thing to most decent players.
  27. #27
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Yeah, this is what I'm thinking.. but it's still very annoying to be facing this, especially if 2+ people on the table float on every raise. Overplay, go allin a lot, mix in check/raises.. seems to be the way to tackle this. But regardless, it adds a lot more variance to the game then I am used to, heh..
    What limits is this? If its small takes i doubt they are floating, they have a piece and dont believe you. Aginst this sort of player ill raise less, only looking to premiums and implied odds (pps etc) and limp a lot more with stuff like JTs if i can preflop, mostly behind them but also infront.
    Then ill make a hand post flop and value bet them through 3 streets and to death basically. Riasing a lot of hands is fun and needed/good in some games but not all.
    If they dont believe you either stop raising 20% hands or stop bluffing them.
    Each table is its own dynamic and you arent gona fold a pp on a raggy flop if he thinks you have overs. So thus play less to a raise or else dont c-bet a flop. You have to find balance between raising/c-betting/limping/check raising in order to value bad players to shit when you have hands and at times push weak hands off what they have. If you c/r with AA on a rag board and get called down or push the turn and an unimproved pp calls, they get the message quick enuf that they shudnt be calling down. they also learn that c/r push is an AA line so you can exploit this idea with AQ missed etc AT TIMES.
    You cant win every pot, so if theyre calling down/floating then make a hand postflop then bet them to death.
  28. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    What limits is this? If its small takes
    Yeah, it's still smallstakes, 50NL prima has many of these sorts of players.

    i doubt they are floating, they have a piece and dont believe you.
    Hm, not sure about the terminology here, but they play like this: They'll call your raises often, with anything like Ax, Kx, Qx, sc, sgappers, pp etc. They are better than standard calling stations since they can read flops, and if it doesn't look like you have it, they'll call you down, or even try to steal a pot on the turn or river.

    Their game seems to be that they want to annoy raisers.. and make a profit off of picking off bluffs/cbets (by calling down with a weaker pair if they suspect you missed), or steal it when you give up on a later street.. or stack you when they hit 2p+ on flop/turn/river on their crappier hand.

    This is kinda what I call floating.. dunno if that is correct?

    Aginst this sort of player ill raise less, only looking to premiums and implied odds (pps etc) and limp a lot more with stuff like JTs if i can preflop, mostly behind them but also infront.
    Then ill make a hand post flop and value bet them through 3 streets and to death basically. Riasing a lot of hands is fun and needed/good in some games but not all.
    If they dont believe you either stop raising 20% hands or stop bluffing them.
    Each table is its own dynamic and you arent gona fold a pp on a raggy flop if he thinks you have overs. So thus play less to a raise or else dont c-bet a flop. You have to find balance between raising/c-betting/limping/check raising in order to value bad players to shit when you have hands and at times push weak hands off what they have. If you c/r with AA on a rag board and get called down or push the turn and an unimproved pp calls, they get the message quick enuf that they shudnt be calling down. they also learn that c/r push is an AA line so you can exploit this idea with AQ missed etc AT TIMES.
    You cant win every pot, so if theyre calling down/floating then make a hand postflop then bet them to death.
    Yeah. I think I might just be sucking the last few days. Been trying to get some playtime in when taking (far too many) breaks from studying, but it's not going well at all. Maybe examstress etc. I didn't have problems with this kind of play in the past, so it might just be something else.
  29. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by jackvance
    How do you adjust to such floater-heavy tables Miffed?
    c/r the turn.
  30. #30
    I agree I should have reraised hand 5. The call OOP is just too weak.
  31. #31
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Yeah, it's still smallstakes, 50NL Prima has many of these sorts of players.
    Play bigger pots with them at 6max tables. I made my money very early on at these tables by overplaying a multitude of hands against players who want to play good but cant get past the thought that players only raise big cards.
    Probably limp more too imo behind limpers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •