|
|
 Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
Here's a hand where he calls instead of raises a small river bet with the second nut flush...
Game # 407035920 - Texas Hold'em No Limit EUR 2/4 - Table "Baeza"
Players(max 6):
mr1andonly (EUR 97.20 in seat 1)
enghel (EUR 56.85 in seat 2)
AUDITT (EUR 715.50 in seat 3)
kfo (EUR 361.89 in seat 4)
holdenff (EUR 408.10 in seat 5)
Cocco_Bill (EUR 414.25 in seat 6)
Dealer: kfo
Small Blind: holdenff (2.00)
Big Blind: Cocco_Bill (4.00)
Cocco_Bill was dealt: 7h - Jh
mr1andonly Fold
AUDITT Call (4.00)
kfo Fold
holdenff Call (2.00)
Cocco_Bill Check
Flop 3s - 4h - 5s
holdenff Check
Cocco_Bill Check
AUDITT Check
Turn 3s - 4h - 5s - 2s
holdenff Check
Cocco_Bill Check
AUDITT Bet (8.00)
holdenff Call (8.00)
Cocco_Bill Fold
River 3s - 4h - 5s - 2s - 4d
holdenff Bet (17.00)
AUDITT Call (17.00)
holdenff shows: Ac - 6s (a straight, six high)
AUDITT shows: 7s - Ks (a flush, king high)
AUDITT wins: EUR 60.00 (with a flush, king high)
Rake: EUR 0.60
Game ended 2006-08-19 13:39:32 GMT+01:00
The hands you posted (including the ones on 2p2) were hands he definitely should have known his hand was good and he played it very weak, but I think this hand is different. On each of those occasions the board was paired when he had a flush, or when he had trips the board was very coordinated with straights and flushes. I'll just respectfully disagree with your fold, looking at the hands you posted on 2p2 he is much more tight passive postflop than I imagined. I can't imagine this player being a winner though FWIW.
Against ANYBODY else though, I think this is by far an easy easy call. I still think this is a call for sure, but it's a little closer than I thought.
|
Reply With Quote