|
|
 Originally Posted by biondino
TALES OF POKER
(I'm right in thinking these are just brag posts, right? Or do you actually want constructive criticism?)
Does it matter if you are or not, it won't stop you from thinking that.
Why is it that we have to examine only losing hands. Why can't we examine winning hands to see if we played well post flop, could've better maximized value, etc.
Just as much can be learned from the constructive analysis of winning hands as from losing hands.
And I already said that I was going to post some hands I played REALLY bad this session. There are people here who still insist on painting me with the wrong brush, and it's getting aggravating.
|
Reply With Quote